Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Isaiah 61

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

1 “The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon Me, Because the LORD has anointed Me To preach good tidings to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives, And the opening of the prison to those who are bound; Isaiah 61:1 (NKJV) 

1 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, on account of which he has anointed me; he has sent me to bring good news to the poor, to heal those who are crushed in heart, to announce release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, Isaiah 61:1 (LES2) 

This seems to be a deliberate suppression of one of the most important signs that pointed to Jesus’ being the Messiah, the healing of blind eyes.

There are two differences worth noting in this verse. The first is that the LXX says that this anointed one was “sent” to bring good news (the gospel message) to the poor. The NT calls Jesus a “sent one” or “apostle” of the New Covenant. (Hebrews 3:1) Jesus was sent to earth by his heavenly Father to offer himself as the Lamb of God for the forgiveness of our sins and to recapture the authority Adam ceded to Satan. Likewise, Jesus “sent” his church to announce the good news of his victory to all who would listen and believe. 

21 So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.” 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. John 20:21–22 (NKJV) 

The second even more significant difference is that the LXX says this anointed one was sent to announce “recovery of sight to the blind.” 

This is not the only place in Isaiah where this coming sign was mentioned.

2 And the desolate places of the Jordan will blossom and rejoice. The glory of Lebanon was given to it, and the honor of Carmel. And my people will see the glory of the Lord and the exaltation of God. 3 Be strong, hands at ease and feeble knees! 4 Give comfort, fainthearted in mind! Be strong; do not be frightened! Look, our God is repaying judgment, and he will repay! He himself will come and save us! 5 Then blind people’s eyes will be opened, and dumb people’s ears will hear. Isaiah 35:2–5 (LES2) 

In this case, the MT agrees with the LXX in saying the blind and dumb will be healed when God will visit his people, both of which were fulfilled by Jesus. Perhaps because this verse was not so conspicuously quoted as a proof of Jesus’ messiahship is why it was left intact.

When Jesus stood in the synagogue in Capernaum at the outset of his public ministry, he read this verse aloud and claimed it applied to him personally.

18 “The Spirit of the LORD is upon Me, Because He has anointed Me To preach the gospel to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives And recovery of sight to the blind, To set at liberty those who are oppressed; Luke 4:18 (NKJV) 

The healing of the blind by Jesus was specifically mentioned in five distinct episodes in the gospels. (Matthew 9:27-31, Matthew 12:22, which was also mentioned in Luke 11:14, Mark 8:22-26, John 9:1-41, and Matthew 20:29-34, which is also mentioned in the other two synoptic gospels – Mark 10:46-52 and Luke 18:35-43). In addition, healing the blind was mentioned in three different summaries of Jesus’ ministry – Matthew 15:30-31, Matthew 21:14, and Luke 7:21-22. Since healing the blind was so remarkable and rare, it served as a primary credential for Jesus’ claim to be the promised one. It is no wonder the Masoretes would wish to cover it up some 1000 years later. 

Someone might at this point contend that the Great Isaiah Scroll from Qumran agrees with the MT. That does not undo the Holy Spirit’s and Jesus’ choice to quote the LXX, proving it is indeed the inspired Word of God. In addition, it is important to remember that there is no chain of custody proving the antiquity, authorship, and credibility of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Some doubt that they are as ancient as claimed. Even if they are  “genuine articles,” it does not prove inspiration by the Holy Spirit. Anything written in the NT, however, is the “official” Word of God.

The only other comment I have is to note that Jesus’ quote in Luke 4:18 also adds at the end, “To set at liberty those who are oppressed.” This not the same as the phrase the MT uses to replace the healing of the blind – “the opening of the prison to those who are bound.” I personally think the Holy Spirit added this phrase to Jesus’ quote to point to his setting demonized people free from that horrible oppression, such as when he healed the woman bound by a spirit of infirmity for eighteen years. (Luke 13:10-17)

2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, And the day of vengeance of our God; To comfort all who mourn, 3 To console those who mourn in Zion, To give them beauty for ashes, The oil of joy for mourning, The garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; That they may be called trees of righteousness, The planting of the LORD, that He may be glorified.” Isaiah 61:2–3 (NKJV) 

2 to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord and the day of repayment, to comfort all who mourn, 3 to give to those who mourn in Zion glory instead of ashes, the anointing of cheer to those who mourn, a garment of glory instead of a spirit of weariness. And they will be called generations of righteousness, a planting of the Lord for glory. Isaiah 61:2–3 (LES2) 

Instead of receiving beauty, which is good, we will receive glory, which is far better. Of course, it can be argued that God’s glory will beautify the saints. Likewise a garment of glory will be given to us, which is the righteousness of Christ, with which we clothe ourselves by faith. (Ephesians 4:24) Instead of being “trees” of righteousness, the LXX says we will be generations of righteousness, which describes all those born of the Spirit.

4 And they shall rebuild the old ruins, They shall raise up the former desolations, And they shall repair the ruined cities, The desolations of many generations. 5 Strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, And the sons of the foreigner Shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers. 6 But you shall be named the priests of the LORD, They shall call you the servants of our God. You shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, And in their glory you shall boast. 7 Instead of your shame you shall have double honor, And instead of confusion they shall rejoice in their portion. Therefore in their land they shall possess double; Everlasting joy shall be theirs. Isaiah 61:4–7 (NKJV)

4 And they will build eternal deserts; they will raise up those that had formerly been deserted, and they will renew deserted cities that have been deserted for generations. 5 Strangers will come tending your sheep, and foreigners will be your plowmen and vine dressers. 6 But you will be called priests of the Lord, ministers of God. You will devour the strength of nations, and you will be amazed at their wealth. 7 So they will inherit the earth a second time, and eternal cheer will be upon their head. Isaiah 61:4–7 (LES2) 

These two passages are very close. The interpretation is difficult. Zionists would apply that to the modern nation of Israel, but that is very doubtful since unredeemed humanity cannot inherit the kingdom of God. I believe this must apply to the Israel of God, the bride of Christ. 

8 “For I, the LORD, love justice; I hate robbery for burnt offering; I will direct their work in truth, And will make with them an everlasting covenant. 9 Their descendants shall be known among the Gentiles, And their offspring among the people. All who see them shall acknowledge them, That they are the posterity whom the LORD has blessed.” Isaiah 61:8–9 (NKJV) 

8 For I am the Lord who loves righteousness and hates the spoils from wrongdoing, and I will give their labor to the righteous, and I will establish an eternal covenant with them. 9 And their seed and their offspring will be known among the nations, in the middle of the peoples. Everyone who sees them will take notice of them, because these are the seed who have been blessed by God, Isaiah 61:8–9 (LES2) 

There are some difference in this passage. Instead of God’s loving justice, the LXX says he loves righteousness, but hates the spoils of wrongdoing, which matches the sentence structure. The MT, however, says he hates “robbery in the burnt offering.” The LXX says that the spoils of wrongdoing will be given to the righteous. The MT says God will direct their work in truth. Both agree that God will make an everlasting covenant with the subjects, which is the New Covenant. This means that the “seed” or descendants are born-again persons, the church. The rest of the promises apply to them.

10 I will greatly rejoice in the LORD, My soul shall be joyful in my God; For He has clothed me with the garments of salvation, He has covered me with the robe of righteousness, As a bridegroom decks himself with ornaments, And as a bride adorns herself with her jewels. 11 For as the earth brings forth its bud, As the garden causes the things that are sown in it to spring forth, So the Lord GOD will cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations. Isaiah 61:10–11 (NKJV) 

10 and they will be cheerful with cheer in the Lord. Let my soul rejoice in the Lord, for he has clothed me with a garment of salvation and a tunic of cheer. He has wrapped a headband on me as on a bridegroom, and he has adorned me with ornamentation like a bride. 11 And as the earth has grown her blossom and like a garden has grown its seeds, so will the lord Lord make righteousness and rejoicing spring forth before all the nations. Isaiah 61:10–11 (LES2) 

The garments, plural, in the MT become garment, singular, in the LXX, which refers to the righteousness of Christ, as mentioned earlier. It is very interesting that the MT indicates that the person adorns himself or herself, but the LXX says that God is the one who adorns us. The gospel has gone forth into the nations causing righteousness and praise to spring up all over the earth.

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Psalm 16:8-11

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

8 I have set the LORD always before me; Because He is at my right hand I shall not be moved. Psalm 16:8 (NKJV) 

8 I saw the Lord in front, before me through everything, because he is from my right side, that I would not be shaken. Psalm 15:8 (LES2) 

This is another psalm quoted in the New Testament from the LXX. 

25 For David says concerning Him: ‘I foresaw the LORD always before my face, For He is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken. Acts 2:25 (NKJV) 

Instead of the MT’s “I have set the Lord always before me,” the LXX and NT quote both use the Greek word “proorao,” which the LXX translates as “saw” and the NT as “foresaw,” which is the literal meaning. The MT has David choosing to “set” God before him, but the LXX and NT both agree that David saw the Lord. One is a choice, the other is a revelation. However, once we receive the revelation, we ought to make the choice to walk in that revelation.

Both the LXX and NT also use the word “shaken,” which carries the same idea as moved.

9 Therefore my heart is glad, and my glory rejoices; My flesh also will rest in hope. 10 For You will not leave my soul in Sheol, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. Psalm 16:9–10 (NKJV) 

9 On account of this, my heart was cheerful, and my tongue rejoiced exceedingly. Moreover, my flesh will dwell in hope, 10 because you will not abandon my soul in Hades, nor will you give your holy one to see destruction. Psalm 15:9–10 (LES2) 

The big difference in this passage is that the MT says “my glory rejoices,” but the LXX and NT agree that the word is “tongue.” The Greek word “aggaliao” for “rejoiced exceedingly” and “was glad.” 

26 Therefore my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad; Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope. 27 For You will not leave my soul in Hades, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. Acts 2:26–27 (NKJV) 

Both the LXX and NT quote use the Greek word diaphthora, which is translated as “destruction” in the LXX and as “corruption” in the NT.

11 You will show me the path of life; In Your presence is fullness of joy; At Your right hand are pleasures forevermore. Psalm 16:11 (NKJV) 

11 You made known to me ways of life. You will make me full of cheer with your face. There are delights at your right side completely. Psalm 15:11 (LES2) 

The quote from Acts is only a part of this verse.

28 You have made known to me the ways of life; You will make me full of joy in Your presence.’ Acts 2:28 (NKJV) 

Even though the English seems a little different when comparing the LXX and NT quote, the Greek in each is exactly the same. The translators simply chose different English words. 

Once again we have evidence that the Bible used by the apostles was the LXX.

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Psalm 14:1-3

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

1 The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, They have done abominable works, There is none who does good. 2 The LORD looks down from heaven upon the children of men, To see if there are any who understand, who seek God. 3 They have all turned aside, They have together become corrupt; There is none who does good, No, not one. Psalm 14:1–3 (NKJV) 

1 The foolish said in his heart, “There is no God.” They destroyed and were abhorred in their practices. There is no one doing goodness; there is not even one. 2 The Lord looked out from the heavens upon the sons of humans, to see if there is one who understands or one who seeks out God. 3 All turned aside together. They became useless. There is not one doing goodness; there is not even one. Their throat is an opened grave. With their tongues they have dealt treacherously with one another. The poison of asps is under their lips, whose mouth is full of curses and bitterness. Their feet are quick to pour out blood. Destruction and misery are in their ways, and they know not the way of peace. There is no fear of God before their eyes. Psalm 13:1–3 (LES2) 

This psalm proves that the New Testament, as is the case 70-80% of the time, quotes from the LXX and not from the MT. In his letter to the Romans Paul quotes a portion of verse three that the MT omits. I underlined the part omitted from the MT. Below is Paul’s quote from Romans. 

10 As it is written: “There is none righteous, no, not one; 11 There is none who understands; There is none who seeks after God. 12 They have all turned aside; They have together become unprofitable; There is none who does good, no, not one.” 13 “Their throat is an open tomb; With their tongues they have practiced deceit”; “The poison of asps is under their lips”; 14 “Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness.” 15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood; 16 Destruction and misery are in their ways; 17 And the way of peace they have not known.” 18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.” Romans 3:10–18 (NKJV) 

This confirms that the LXX is the inspired Word of God. 

In addition, the MT says in verse three that those who forget God have become “corrupt,” but the LXX and NT agree that the word is “unprofitable” or “useless.” The same Greek word is used in both the LXX and NT, but is translated using different English words which mean the same thing.

Why did the Masoretes omit this passage? Was it to delegitimize Paul or falsify the New Testament? We will probably never know for sure.

     

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Haggai 2:6-9

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

6 “For thus says the LORD of hosts: ‘Once more (it is a little while) I will shake heaven and earth, the sea and dry land; 7 and I will shake all nations, and they shall come to the Desire of All Nations, and I will fill this temple with glory,’ says the LORD of hosts. Haggai 2:6–7 (NKJV) 

6 Because the Lord Almighty says, ‘Once again I shall shake heaven and earth and sea and dry land. 7 And I shall shake all nations, and selected people of all nations shall come and fill this house with glory,’ says the Lord Almighty. Haggai 2:6–7 (LES2) 

This passage clearly illustrates how the MT seeks to elevate national Israel and the Old Covenant at the expense of Christ and the New Covenant.

Verse six in both translations agree, but in verse seven the MT changes the “elect from all nations” in the LXX to “the Desire of All Nations,” which is an uncertain term likely meaning either God himself, the temple, or Israel. It could also mean the Lord Jesus, who is desired by God, but by using an ambiguous phrase the meaning is left open to interpretation instead of being clear as it is in the LXX.

The idea in the MT is that the nations will come to whatever or whoever the Desire of All Nations is, and God will then fill the temple with glory. The LXX indicates that after or because of the shaking of the nations, God will draw from them an elect group who will fill his house. Interestingly, the Hebrew word that the MT translates as temple here means house, too.

The temple was intended to “house” God’s presence, but this was a temporary situation in the Old Covenant that served as a picture of what was coming. In the New Covenant, God would dwell in a temple or house made of people, who Peter calls “living stones.” 

4 Coming to Him as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen by God and precious, 5 you also, as living stones, are being built up a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. 1 Peter 2:4–5 (NKJV) 

His eternal purpose has always been to dwell with and in his people. (Revelation 21:22-27)

We know that the Old Covenant scriptures point to Christ and the New Covenant. (John 5:39) Because of this, the New Testament teaches us how to interpret the Old, and not the other way around. The New Covenant “house” or temple is the church, the body of Christ, the new man in Christ, the Israel of God. Because the gospel has gone to the nations, God is drawing to himself his elect from every people group to be part of this “house.” This house is filled with the glory of God, the very presence of the Holy Spirit.

8 ‘The silver is Mine, and the gold is Mine,’ says the LORD of hosts. 9 ‘The glory of this latter temple shall be greater than the former,’ says the LORD of hosts. ‘And in this place I will give peace,’ says the LORD of hosts.” Haggai 2:8–9 (NKJV) 

8 ‘The silver is mine, and the gold is mine,’ says the Lord Almighty. 9 ‘Because the latter glory of this house shall be great beyond the former,’ says the Lord Almighty. ‘And in this place I shall give peace,’ says the Lord Almighty, ‘even peace of spirit for a possession to all those who build, so as to raise up this temple.’ ” Haggai 2:8–9 (LES2) 

In the last days, it will no doubt be important for us to understand that there is no financial shortage in God’s kingdom, especially if the evil world system seeks to control the flow of money based on allegiance to evil. 

The glory of the New Testament church, the temple or house made of people, will exceed the glory of the one made with stones in the Old Testament. 

Peace will fill the New Covenant house because all those who are part of it have been justified or made right with God, with peace being the natural result. (Romans 5:1) God gives his Spirit as a possession to those who belong to him via the new birth. 

16 Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? 17 If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are. 1 Corinthians 3:16–17 (NKJV) 

God has promised to give peace to his New Covenant saints to be workers who build this new glorious temple through preaching the gospel and nurturing his born-again people.

The Holy Spirit is given to us as an eternal “possession” or companion. He is called the “Helper,” one called alongside us who indwells us. (John 14:16) More importantly, perhaps, the indwelling Spirit of God guarantees that we are God’s eternal possession. 

13 In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory. Ephesians 1:13–14 (NKJV) 

This mutual possession is pictured in marriage which gives each spouse ownership of the other. (1 Corinthians 7:3-4) This is also pictured in the Song of Solomon, a foreshadowing of the love between Christ and his bride, the church.

2 I am my beloved’s, and my beloved is mine, he who shepherds among the lilies. Song of Solomon 6:2 (LES2) 

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Isaiah 55

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

1 “Ho! Everyone who thirsts, Come to the waters; And you who have no money, Come, buy and eat. Yes, come, buy wine and milk Without money and without price. 2 Why do you spend money for what is not bread, And your wages for what does not satisfy? Listen carefully to Me, and eat what is good, And let your soul delight itself in abundance. Isaiah 55:1–2 (NKJV) 

1 You who thirst, go to the water, and whoever has no silver, go buy and eat wine and fat without silver or price. 2 For what purpose do you value silver, and your labor does not satisfy? And you will eat good things, and your soul will exult in good things. Isaiah 55:1–2 (LES2) 

Building upon my idea that the MT presents Isaiah in a way that generally elevates Israel and hides Jesus, the opening words of this chapter of Isaiah in the MT invite the thirsty and hungry to come, presumably to Israel. The LXX, however, exhorts us to go to the water, which is not found in Old Covenant or the nation of Israel, per se, or Judaism, but in Christ alone. He alone can satisfy the deepest longings and needs of our souls.

Jesus suffered outside the city of Jerusalem as something unclean. We must go outside the camp, outside the walls of Judaism, to find the Lord.

10 We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat. 11 For the bodies of those animals, whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burned outside the camp. 12 Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered outside the gate. 13 Therefore let us go forth to Him, outside the camp, bearing His reproach. Hebrews 13:10–13 (NKJV) 

3 Incline your ear, and come to Me. Hear, and your soul shall live; And I will make an everlasting covenant with you— The sure mercies of David. 4 Indeed I have given him as a witness to the people, A leader and commander for the people. Isaiah 55:3–4 (NKJV) 

3 Pay attention with your ear and attend to my ways. Hear me, and your soul will live among good things, and I will establish an eternal covenant with you; the holy things of David are sure. 4 Look! I gave him as a testimony among the nations, a ruler and one who commands the nations. Isaiah 55:3–4 (LES2) 

The MT invites the hearer to come to God. The LXX says to attend to his ways. Both are good. Both promise that God will establish an eternal (New) covenant with such a person. The MT calls this covenant “the sure mercies of David.” The LXX says “the holy things of David (Christ) are sure.” Both are true.

It is important for us to understand that all scripture points to Christ. (John 5:39) David, in this case, is pointer to his descendant, the Messiah, our Lord Jesus. Jesus has been given as a testimony or witness among the nations, a ruler (Lord) over the nations. (Revelation 2:27)

5 Surely you shall call a nation you do not know, And nations who do not know you shall run to you, Because of the LORD your God, And the Holy One of Israel; For He has glorified you.” Isaiah 55:5 (NKJV) 

5 The nations, which do not know you, will call upon you, and the peoples, who do not know you, will flee to you for refuge because of the Lord your God, the holy one of Israel, because he has magnified you. Isaiah 55:5 (LES2) 

Here is another example, in my opinion, where the MT obfuscates a clear reference to Christ. It changed “the nations which do not know you will call upon you,” to “you shall call a nation you do not know.” The remainder of the verse shows agreement between the MT and LXX.

The verse clearly refers to Christ. The Gentile nations and elect Jews have run to him for refuge upon hearing the gospel because Jesus has been elevated to the position of Lord of lords.

6 Seek the LORD while He may be found, Call upon Him while He is near. 7 Let the wicked forsake his way, And the unrighteous man his thoughts; Let him return to the LORD, And He will have mercy on him; And to our God, For He will abundantly pardon. Isaiah 55:6–7 (NKJV) 

6 Seek out the Lord, and when you find him, call upon him. And if ever he approaches you, 7 let the ungodly abandon his ways and the man of lawlessness his counsels, and let him return to the Lord, and he will be shown mercy, because he will forgive your sins abundantly. Isaiah 55:6–7 (LES2) 

The LXX is quite different in that it promises that those who seek God will find him…. “and when you find him.” Instead of “while he is near,” the LXX says, “And if he ever approaches you.” The truth is that God finds us, not we him. It is God who comes knocking on the door of our hearts. Our job is to open it to him by inviting him in, repenting for our sins, and receiving the forgiveness he offers. 

8 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways,” says the LORD. 9 “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher than your ways, And My thoughts than your thoughts. Isaiah 55:8–9 (NKJV) 

8 “For my counsels are not like your counsels or my ways like your ways,” says the Lord, 9 “but as the heaven is far off from the earth, so my way is far off from your ways and your thoughts from my mind. Isaiah 55:8–9 (LES2) 

The MT and LXX essentially agree in this passage.

10 “For as the rain comes down, and the snow from heaven, And do not return there, But water the earth, And make it bring forth and bud, That it may give seed to the sower And bread to the eater, 11 So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth; It shall not return to Me void, But it shall accomplish what I please, And it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it. Isaiah 55:10–11 (NKJV) 

10 For as the rain or snow comes down from the heavens and does not return until it has drenched the earth and brings forth and sprouts and gives seed to the sower and bread for food, 11 so will be my word, which goes out from my mouth: It will not return until that which I want is completed, and I will cause your ways and my orders to prosper.” Isaiah 55:10–11 (LES2) 

The MT is not scientifically accurate. The water cycle includes evaporation, rain, re-evaporation, and so on. The LXX gets this right by saying the rain stays until it accomplishes it purpose to water the ground and bring forth food. The Holy Spirit applies this to the Word of God, which can be broadly understood or narrowed to apply to the gospel message. God promises to those who publish his word that they will prosper personally, just as will God’s will.

12 “For you shall go out with joy, And be led out with peace; The mountains and the hills Shall break forth into singing before you, And all the trees of the field shall clap their hands. 13 Instead of the thorn shall come up the cypress tree, And instead of the brier shall come up the myrtle tree; And it shall be to the LORD for a name, For an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off.” Isaiah 55:12–13 (NKJV) 

12 For you will go out with cheer, and you will be taught with delight, for the mountains and the hills will leap and welcome you with delight, and all the trees of the field will clap their branches. 13 And the cypress will grow up instead of the shrub, and the myrtle will grow up instead of the nettle, and the Lord will become a name and an eternal sign, and he will not come to an end. Isaiah 55:12–13 (LES2) 

Both the MT and LXX provide insight into God’s blessings on the evangelist and teacher of his Word. They will go out with joy, be led in peace, and taught with delight. Nature itself rejoices because of the gospel, which eventually, at Christ’s return, will result in its deliverance from the bondage initiated by Adam’s sin. (Romans 8:21)

The MT resorts to using a passive voice in verse 13. The LXX changes the subject and voice of the verb when it says, “the Lord will become a name and an eternal sign.” The only name under heaven given among men whereby we can be saved is the name of Jesus. His resurrection is an eternal sign. The life he provides will never end.

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Psalm 12

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

1 Help, LORD, for the godly man ceases! For the faithful disappear from among the sons of men. Psalm 12:1 (NKJV) 

2 Save me, O Lord, because the holy one has come to an end, because the truths have diminished from the sons of humans. Psalm 11:2 (LES2) 

I believe in the LXX  this is a prophecy about Jesus and the church; whereas, the MT is written from the perspective of natural Israel. This will inform how I approach it. 

I believe the “holy one” is Jesus, and this is a reference to his death on the cross. He is the Truth. When he perished, truth died, too.

2 They speak idly everyone with his neighbor; With flattering lips and a double heart they speak. 3 May the LORD cut off all flattering lips, And the tongue that speaks proud things, 4 Who have said, “With our tongue we will prevail; Our lips are our own; Who is lord over us?” Psalm 12:2–4 (NKJV) 

3 Each person spoke vanities to his neighbor. deceitful lips spoke in heart and in heart. 4 May the Lord destroy all the deceitful lips and a boasting tongue, 5 those who said, “We are powerful with respect to our tongue; our lips are from us. Who is our lord?” Psalm 11:3–5 (LES2) 

The MT and LXX essentially agree in this passage. The most interesting thing to me is how important surrendering the tongue to God is. I believe this is why our salvation requires us to confess that Christ is the Lord. (Romans 10:9-10) It also sheds light on the importance of speaking in tongues, which is a surrender of our tongue to the Holy Spirit which allows us to pray and praise God perfectly.

5 “For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, Now I will arise,” says the LORD; “I will set him in the safety for which he yearns.” Psalm 12:5 (NKJV) 

6 “From the distress of the needy, and from the groaning of the poor ones, I will now stand up,” says the Lord. “I will set him in salvation; I will speak openly for him.” Psalm 11:6 (LES2) 

This verse declares the resurrection of Christ, which is our salvation. The Greek word for “stand up” in the LXX is the same one used for Christ’s being risen, which agrees with the MT. The LXX says that God will set the poor one in “salvation,” which is the Greek word soteria, from which Savior is derived. I believe God speaks openly for us, declaring that we belong to him, just as a bridegroom proudly declares that his wife is his by covenant (and vice versa). The gift of the Holy Spirit is God’s seal proving his ownership. (2 Corinthians 1:22)

7 You shall keep them, O LORD, You shall preserve them from this generation forever. 8 The wicked prowl on every side, When vileness is exalted among the sons of men. Psalm 12:7–8 (NKJV) 

8 You, O Lord, will guard us, and you will preserve us from this generation and for eternity. 9 The ungodly ones walk around in a circle. According to your height you treated with much care the sons of humans. Psalm 11:8–9 (LES2) 

The MT promises God will preserve “them,” but the LXX says he will preserve “us.” Perhaps this is because the MT is written from natural Israel’s perspective and knows that salvation is for “them,” the born again ones, but the LXX is written from the church’s viewpoint, for which salvation is for “us.” Just a thought.

In the New Covenant, our salvation and life is eternal. 

The LXX mentions the presence of evil ones who are going nowhere fast, but God treats us with much care.

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Isaiah 54

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

1 “Sing, O barren, You who have not borne! Break forth into singing, and cry aloud, You who have not labored with child! For more are the children of the desolate Than the children of the married woman,” says the LORD. 2 “Enlarge the place of your tent, And let them stretch out the curtains of your dwellings; Do not spare; Lengthen your cords, And strengthen your stakes. 3 For you shall expand to the right and to the left, And your descendants will inherit the nations, And make the desolate cities inhabited. Isaiah 54:1–3 (NKJV) 

1 Be cheerful, O barren one who does not father! Break forth and cry aloud, you who are not in labor, because the children of the deserted woman will be more than those of the woman who has a husband, for the Lord has said it. 2 Enlarge the place of your tent and of your curtains; pitch it, do not spare; lengthen your borders and strengthen your tent pegs! 3 Spread out your dwellings even to the right and the left, and your seed will inherit nations, and you will settle wasted cities. Isaiah 54:1–3 (LES2) 

The LXX says the barren one should be cheerful. Since this is a woman, “father” is an odd choice of words, when the Greek word “tikto” means to bring forth, bear , or produce. The context is child birth; so, I prefer the LXX’s “break forth and cry aloud.” I also prefer the LXX’s use of the present tense, which seems to fit better. The use of the word “husband” by the LXX fits better with what follows, rather than using “married woman.”

The use of “lengthen your borders [portion or allotment]” in the LXX has more meaning than the MT’s “lengthen your cords.” 

The middle part of verse three requires us to decide if “seed” (singular) refers to natural Israel or to Jesus. The natural descendants of Abraham were promised a land located in Canaan, but Jesus, the Messiah, was specifically told he would inherit the nations. 

6 “But I was appointed by him in Mount Zion, his holy place, 7 announcing the ordinance of the Lord. The Lord said to me, ‘You are my son; today I have fathered you. 8 Ask from me, and I will give to you the nations as your inheritance, and as your possession the ends of the earth. Psalm 2:6–8 (LES2) 

The church is included in this promise since we are “in Christ” can will co-rule with him at the end. (2 Timothy 2:12)

26 ‘He who overcomes, and he who keeps My deeds until the end, TO HIM I WILL GIVE AUTHORITY OVER THE NATIONS; 27 AND HE SHALL RULE THEM WITH A ROD OF IRON, AS THE VESSELS OF THE POTTER ARE BROKEN TO PIECES, as I also have received authority from My Father; 28 and I will give him the morning star. 29 ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’ Revelation 2:26–29 (NASB95) 

As I have written elsewhere, this cannot apply to the modern nation of Israel because the natural man cannot inherit the kingdom of God. The natural nation of Israel will not receive what is promised to the “Israel of God,” the one new man in Christ.

The church has spread all over the world since Pentecost and inhabits desolate cities bringing new life to the inhabitants through the gospel.

4 “Do not fear, for you will not be ashamed; Neither be disgraced, for you will not be put to shame; For you will forget the shame of your youth, And will not remember the reproach of your widowhood anymore. 5 For your Maker is your husband, The LORD of hosts is His name; And your Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel; He is called the God of the whole earth. 6 For the LORD has called you Like a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, Like a youthful wife when you were refused,” Says your God. Isaiah 54:4–6 (NKJV) 

4 Do not be frightened because you were disgraced or feel shame because you were reviled, because you will forget the eternal shame and will not remember the reproach of your widowhood. 5 For the Lord who made you—the Lord Sabaoth is his name—and the God of Israel himself is the one who rescues you; so will he be called in all the earth. 6 “The Lord has called you not like an abandoned and discouraged woman or like a woman who was hated from her youth,” said your God. Isaiah 54:4–6 (LES2) 

This passage highlights some of the differences between the MT and LXX that appear very often, particularly the difference in the tenses of the verbs.

The MT tells the barren, desolate woman not to fear for she will not be ashamed. From the context we know that she has already experienced the shame of abandonment and barrenness. The LXX says it better by telling her not to be frightened because she has already experienced the shame and disgrace of her widowhood. Fear would have been real because society then depended on the family for support for the aged. A childless widow would likely have been in real trouble, unless other family members came to her aid. 

Both the MT and LXX say this woman will no longer remember this shame for the Lord himself will rescue her. Interestingly, the MT says she was called “like a woman forsaken,” but the LXX says the Lord has called her “not like an abandoned and discouraged woman.”

In the LXX, her abandonment is a thing of the past. The Lord is calling her to a new identity. We are required to try to try to identify this formerly abandoned woman. Is it Israel or another woman, perhaps the Bride of Christ? We know from other scriptures that the Gentile nations, who were not a people, in Christ are called God’s people. 

9 But you are A CHOSEN RACE, A royal PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE FOR God’s OWN POSSESSION, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; 10 for you once were NOT A PEOPLE, but now you are THE PEOPLE OF GOD; you had NOT RECEIVED MERCY, but now you have RECEIVED MERCY. 1 Peter 2:9–10 (NASB95) 

Peter’s quote is from Hosea 2:23, which Paul quotes in his letter to the Romans.

23 and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? 25 As He says also in Hosea: “I will call them My people, who were not My people, And her beloved, who was not beloved.” Romans 9:23–25 (NKJV) 

Ultimately, the Jewish people were cast aside for their rejection of the Messiah and the kingdom was given to the church, the Israel of God, the one new man in Christ composed of born again Jews and Gentiles, just as Jesus said would happen. (Matthew 21:43)

7 “For a mere moment I have forsaken you, But with great mercies I will gather you. 8 With a little wrath I hid My face from you for a moment; But with everlasting kindness I will have mercy on you,” Says the LORD, your Redeemer. 9 “For this is like the waters of Noah to Me; For as I have sworn That the waters of Noah would no longer cover the earth, So have I sworn That I would not be angry with you, nor rebuke you. 10 For the mountains shall depart And the hills be removed, But My kindness shall not depart from you, Nor shall My covenant of peace be removed,” Says the LORD, who has mercy on you. Isaiah 54:7–10 (NKJV) 

7 “I abandoned you for a little time, and I will show mercy to you with great mercy. 8 I turned my face back from you with a little wrath, but I will show mercy to you with eternal mercy,” said the Lord who rescues you. 9 “Since the water that was at the time of Noah, this is my oath, just as I swore to him at that time: to be no longer angry at the earth over you; nor in your terror 10 to remove the mountains; nor will your hills be moved away. So neither will my compassion for you come to an end, and the covenant of your peace will certainly not depart, for he has said, ‘Mercy be with you, Lord.’ Isaiah 54:7–10 (LES2) 

All people have experienced a time of God’s turning away due to the sin of Adam which has reproduced itself in every successive generation. God’s anger against sin burned against the entire earth in the time of Noah, resulting in his sending a flood as judgment. But in his mercy, God saved a remnant, Noah’s family. Even now, God’s anger against sin continues, but for those who put their faith in Christ, who took that righteous indignation upon himself at the cross, we experience God’s mercy, which will never end.

The MT says in verse ten that the “mountains shall depart,” but the LXX says that he will NOT remove the mountains. The certainty of his everlasting covenant is compared to the stability of the mountains. 

1 Those who trust in the Lord are like the mountain of Zion. The one who inhabits Jerusalem will not be shaken for eternity. 2 Mountains are in a circle around it, and the Lord is in a circle around his people, from now and until eternity. Psalm 124:1–2 (LES2) 

11 “O you afflicted one, Tossed with tempest, and not comforted, Behold, I will lay your stones with colorful gems, And lay your foundations with sapphires. 12 I will make your pinnacles of rubies, Your gates of crystal, And all your walls of precious stones. Isaiah 54:11–12 (NKJV) 

11 “Low and unsettled one, you have not been comforted. Look! I am preparing a ruby for you as your stone and sapphire as your foundations, 12 and I will make your bulwarks jasper, and your gates stones of crystal, and your wall choice stones.  Isaiah 54:11–12 (LES2) 

This must be a promise to the church, the Israel of God, because the setting is heaven, where the foundation or floor, which is the firmament, is made of a sapphire-like pavement. The New Jerusalem, which descends from heaven, is described in a similar fashion. 

9 Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls filled with the seven last plagues came to me and talked with me, saying, “Come, I will show you the bride, the Lamb’s wife.” 10 And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me the great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, 11 having the glory of God. Her light was like a most precious stone, like a jasper stone, clear as crystal. Revelation 21:9–11 (NKJV) 

After leaving heaven, this New Jerusalem would no longer have a foundation of sapphire, but would be set upon the recreated earth. 

13 All your children shall be taught by the LORD, And great shall be the peace of your children. Isaiah 54:13 (NKJV) 

13 And all your sons will be instructed by God, and your children will live in great peace. Isaiah 54:13 (LES2) 

In the New Covenant, everyone is personally instructed by God to know him. 

11 None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them. 12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.” 13 In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away. Hebrews 8:11–13 (NKJV) 

The promise is to “you,” which is singular, which must refer to the church, from whom all believers are related through the new birth as a result of hearing and believing the gospel.

We receive God’s peace through being justified by faith in Christ. Romans 5:1

14 In righteousness you shall be established; You shall be far from oppression, for you shall not fear; And from terror, for it shall not come near you. 15 Indeed they shall surely assemble, but not because of Me. Whoever assembles against you shall fall for your sake. Isaiah 54:14–15 (NKJV) 

14 You will be built up in righteousness. Abstain from an unjust person, and you will not be frightened, and trembling will not approach you. 15 Look! Strangers will come to you through me and will dwell beside you and flee to you for refuge. Isaiah 54:14–15 (LES2) 

What a difference here! The MT says, “You shall be far from oppression,” but the LXX says, “Abstain or put off an unjust person.” Both promise that the “you” will not be frightened. Once again, I think this must refer to the church, not natural Israel, who cannot inherit the kingdom of God any more than our physical bodies can. (1 Corinthians 15:50) It is only through the new birth and resurrection that this is possible. Since this is so, the LXX makes more sense to me. Rather than being a promise that enemies will fall for our sake, the LXX says that “strangers,” those outside God’s New Covenant, will be drawn to Christ and the church and find refuge.

11 Therefore remember that you, once Gentiles in the flesh—who are called Uncircumcision by what is called the Circumcision made in the flesh by hands—12 that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. Ephesians 2:11–13 (NKJV) 

16 “Behold, I have created the blacksmith Who blows the coals in the fire, Who brings forth an instrument for his work; And I have created the spoiler to destroy. 17 No weapon formed against you shall prosper, And every tongue which rises against you in judgment You shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, And their righteousness is from Me,” Says the LORD. Isaiah 54:16–17 (NKJV) 

16 Look! I created you, not like a coppersmith blowing on coals and bringing forth a vessel fit for work; but I did not create you for destruction to destroy you. 17 I will not prosper any  artificial vessel against you, and every voice will rise up against you in judgment. You will overcome all of them, and they will be subject to you in it. There is an inheritance for those who attend the Lord, and you will be my righteous ones,” says the Lord. Isaiah 54:16–17 (LES2) 

What a divergence! The MT focuses on Israel’s enemies and promises she will defeat them. The LXX focuses on the church and his promise that she was not created for destruction. Both promise that weapons formed against us will not succeed, nor will condemning voices. 

Jesus promised both of these things to the church.

18 And He said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. 19 Behold, I give you the authority to trample on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means hurt you. 20 Nevertheless do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rather rejoice because your names are written in heaven.Luke 10:18–20 (NKJV) 

24 “Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life. John 5:24 (NKJV) 

God’s protection and the authority he gives us cannot compare to the inheritance that awaits us in heaven, to which the LXX refers. Our inheritance is not the blessing of protection, as indicated in the MT, but our heavenly reward, which will be for God’s righteous ones, those justified by faith in Christ.

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

The Counter Revolution

The introduction of heliocentric cosmology by Copernicus and others was a counterattack against the Protestant Reformation and a rebellion against God and the Bible’s authority. The following documentary provides an historical background and analysis of this counterattack upon God’s Word. If you have never watched it, please consider doing so. A lot of research and effort went into its production.

A long overdue counter revolution by those who are trying to be loyal to God’s Word is now in motion. The Protestant Reformation was led by faithful men and women who valued God’s Word above their own reputations, possessions, and lives. They spoke out and stood strong when it was unpopular and costly to them personally. We are faced with similar, perhaps, challenge today regarding biblical cosmology. Publicly maintaining this position may cost us credibility or reputation in the eyes of others, relationships with family, loved ones, friends, and colleagues, and might even affect us financially or ministry-wise, as it already has for others.

It takes courage to stand up for God’s Word when the world system and part of the church hates us for doing so.

We have been taught or “programmed” from early childhood to believe that the earth is a spinning globe hurtling through space at about a million miles per hour, locked into a mathematically impossible elliptical orbit around the sun, going in twelve different directions and velocities, which are ever changing. This indoctrination continues on a daily basis, reinforced by the institutions connected with education, the media, science, and the government. Its effect is similar to a phenomenon called “mass formation,” about which Belgian psychologist Mattias Desmet has spoken and written a great deal.

In summary, three things can be observed in any society in which mass formation through propaganda has taken place.

  1. The loss of capacity to take a critical distance from what the group believes,
  2. The willingness to make extreme sacrifices, and
  3. Radical intolerance of dissonant voices, potentially leading to committing atrocities against them.

When this happens two groups will emerge: the pros and the cons. During the corona crisis, examples of those two groups were the maskers vs the non-maskers and the vaccinated vs. the non-vaccinated. The “nons” came under intense criticism and sometimes lost friends and employment as a consequence of making a conscientious stand.

The “pros” had the loud voice of the establishment on their side; so, it took a lot of courage to be an outspoken “non.”

Applying this to our subject, the cosmos, heliocentrists have long been the dominant voice who are reinforced by the word system. Of late, we have seen the emergence of the strengthening dissonant voice of biblical cosmology, which, not surprisingly, is resisted, criticized, and even mildly persecuted at times by the dominant side. Some Christians even have been willing to sacrifice their professed devotion to God’s Word in order to attack proponents of biblical cosmology.

Heliocentrism is an outright contradiction of what the Bible teaches in Genesis Chapter One and throughout the rest of its pages.

As we have covered in previous articles, over time, since the advent of heliocentrism, the church in general transitioned from resisting this anti-biblical position to fully embracing it.

Some on the “anti” side ask why is this issue important? Does it really make any practical difference in our daily lives? After all, no matter what we believe regarding this issue, we still have to do the same things as usual each day. Below are some reasons why I think people question the relevance and importance of biblical cosmology.

  1. We believe what is called ‘biblical cosmology” is false, and we are unwilling to identify ourselves with it lest it be personally embarrassing and defamatory to the church and the gospel.
  2. We believe it may indeed be true, but is not relevant to every day life and is a distraction from and erects unnecessary roadblocks to the gospel message.
  3. We believe the truth about this issue is ultimately unknowable; so, any debate will be unproductive.

Regarding the first point, if heliocentrism is true, it undermines the entire Bible, not just Genesis Chapter One, and thereby undermines the credibility of the gospel message. Surely calling the church to repent for believing what contradicts the Bible is important!

Regarding the second point, should we be willing to compromise the truth of God’s Word in order to make it easier for a person to accept Christ? Do we think that the only truth that matters is “gospel” truth? Are we saying that God does not care if we are deceived in other areas? Surely not! Another name for Jesus is The Truth; (John 14:6) therefore, all truth matters. Deception in any form is always evil.

Therefore, it is important for us to know and believe the truth about something so fundamental as the nature of the world in which we live.

What we believe about biblical cosmology is not essential to salvation, but it is not inconsequential to the gospel. To be saved, we are required to believe that Christ rose from the dead and confess that he is the Lord. (Romans 10:9-10) The gospel reestablishes Christ’s lordship over all things.

Recognizing Christ’s lordship is the essence of what it means to become a Christian. Surrendering to his Lordship in every area of life is the core of discipleship. This includes what we think about the heavens and the earth.

Are we afraid our listeners will reject Christ because they will refuse to believe what the Bible says about cosmology? Perhaps this is just the sort of test we need to see if people are serious about following the Lord. Would we not commit the same error as “seeker sensitive” churches that refuse to address controversial topics, such as abortion? Will not this “consumerist” approach to the gospel likely fill our churches with people who have never been challenged to surrender everything to Christ the Lord? Is our goal to make disciples or converts? Perhaps our reluctance to challenge others regarding God’s truth about cosmology is because we ourselves refuse to submit this area to the Lord.

Therefore, I believe that we need not shy away from the challenge of bringing our cosmology under Christ’s and the Word’s authority. 

God takes us as we are, but works to transform us into Christ’s image by changing how we think.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. Romans 12:2 (NASB95)

The literal meaning of the Greek word metanoeo, which is translated “to repent” in English, is “to change the mind.” As we grow in our knowledge of God’s Word, he expects us to alter how we think about all sorts of things and to bring our ideas into alignment with God’s truth, including our cosmology.

Therefore, I conclude that, while embracing a biblical cosmology is not essential to initial salvation, it may become important on our discipleship journey. 

revolutionRegarding whether biblical cosmology is relevant to everyday life, I think that uncovering one of the greatest lies ever told is highly important and changes how we look at the world. Spiritually speaking, ever since coming to the realization that the firmament is real and God’s throne is right above us, it changed how I and many others look at the world in which we live. We cannot but be awed by a Creator who benevolently observes his creation from on high. Here is a link to some personal testimonies of people who have come to faith after accepting the truth of biblical cosmology.

Regarding the third point, whether the design of the heavens and earth is truly knowable, this is where faith comes to the forefront. I revolutionhave been told that my belief in biblical cosmology is a religious belief, rather than a rational or scientific one. I do not think the person who said that realized the irony of his words. All of life is somewhat mysterious and requires us to approach it by faith. That is why God said that without faith it is impossible to please him. (Hebrews 11:6) Even atheistic astrophysicists acknowledge that what is called “science” requires that we employ faith. The big question is faith in what or whom?

 

A vast number of people today, it seems, have more faith in “science” and in their own opinions than in God’s Word. 

So, yes, biblical cosmology is a matter of faith in God’s Word, but it also agrees with observation and common sense; whereas, many of the claims of “science” in relationship to heliocentrism require us to abandon common sense and accept the words of so-called experts.

Whether you agree with me or any other person about biblical cosmology is not really important, but whether we agree with the Bible is.

Ultimately, this is an issue that requires each of us to stand individually before God and answer a huge question. Do I believe what the Bible teaches about cosmology or not? I believe that God is calling us, the church, to repent for participating in the satanic heliocentric rebellion.

Even though most of us got caught up in this lie unwittingly, once we see the truth, we have a responsibility to become active in the counter revolution. 

The aforementioned Mattias Desmet concluded that the only way a society that is gripped by mass formation and propaganda can avoid descending into totalitarianism is for dissenting voices to continue to speak out. Regarding biblical cosmology, I hope that you and I will be part of that dissenting voice for truth. 

I have come to the conclusion that we do not really find truth. It finds us. Jesus said the we do not choose him. He chose us. (John 15:16) But when truth comes knocking, it is our privilege and responsibility to open the door. 

20 Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with him, and he with Me. Revelation 3:20 (NKJV) 

Now, let me conclude with a little humor.

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Isaiah 53:10-12

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise Him; He has put Him to grief. When You make His soul an offering for sin, He shall see His seed, He shall prolong His days, And the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in His hand. 11 He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied. By His knowledge My righteous Servant shall justify many, For He shall bear their iniquities. Isaiah 53:10–11 (NKJV) 

10 The Lord is willing to cleanse him of the injury. If you give concerning sin, our soul will see long-lived seed, and the Lord wishes to remove him from the difficulty of his soul, 11 to show him the light, and to form him with understanding, to justify the righteous who serves many well; and he himself will bear their sins. Isaiah 53:10–11 (LES2) 

The Lord also is pleased to purge him from his stroke. If ye can give an offering for sin, your soul shall see a long-lived seed: 11 the Lord also is pleased to take away from the travail of his soul, to shew him light, and to form him with understanding; to justify the just one who serves many well; and he shall bear their sins. (Brenton, Sir Lancelot C. L.. English Translation of the Greek Septuagint, Including the Apocrypha . E.C. Marsh. Kindle Edition.

)

This is a challenging passage to translate and understand. Interestingly, the great Isaiah scroll found at Qumran agrees with the LXX in verse 11.

In verse 10, the MT says that “it pleased the Lord to bruise him; He has put him to grief.” The LXX words it thusly, “The Lord is willing to cleanse [or purge] him of the injury” or “blow.” The interpretation of the MT would likely be that Abba Father allowed Jesus to suffer the penalty for our sin. The understanding of the LXX is that Abba was willing or pleased to deliver him from death via the resurrection. As with a good bit of Isaiah 53, both the MT and LXX seem to be true and give insight. 

The next part in the MT clearly refers to the justification and eternal life provided to those who trust in Jesus and his atoning work in the cross. It goes on to remark that God’s will will prosper under Jesus’ rule. The LXX veers away from the MT here, and as mentioned above, the Dead Sea Scroll of Isaiah agrees with the LXX here. It says that “the Lord wishes to remove (take away) him from the difficulty (great trouble or travail) of his soul, to show him the light, and to form him with understanding, to justify the righteous who serves many well; and he himself will bear their sins.”

Both speak of God delivering Christ from the throes of death and using his finished work on the cross and through the resurrection to justify those who put their faith in him.

12 Therefore I will divide Him a portion with the great, And He shall divide the spoil with the strong, Because He poured out His soul unto death, And He was numbered with the transgressors, And He bore the sin of many, And made intercession for the transgressors. Isaiah 53:12 (NKJV) 

12 Because of this he will cause many to inherit, and he will apportion the spoils of the mighty, because his soul was given over to death, and he was reckoned among the lawless, and he himself bore the sins of many, and he was handed over because of their lawlessness. Isaiah 53:12 (LES2) 

 Here the MT speaks of Christ being rewarded with “the great” and “divide spoil with the strong.” This seems to put Christ on the same level as other mighty ones. The LXX, however, magnifies Christ by saying “he will will cause many to inherit,” meaning his people, and give us that which formerly belonged to the mighty who have been defeated, meaning Satan and his minions. I much prefer the LXX here.

The MT and LXX agree in remainder of the verse

    This concludes Isaiah 53. I believe it reveals how the MT tries to put difficult passages in more easily understood words, much as the New Living Translation does. Just as the NLT sometimes hits a “home run,” so does the MT. At other times, however, the NLT misses the mark, requiring us to examine more literal translations to find the true meaning. I believe the LXX is the more literal translation and, therefore, sometimes is more difficult to understand. It is worth the effort to try, however.
     

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT

Rediscovering the Septuagint (LXX): Isaiah 53:6-9

I hope you will journey with me in rediscovering the beauty of God’s Word in the Septuagint (LXX). In 285 BC, the LXX was translated from paleo-Hebrew by 70 Jewish translators into Greek, the language of most of the civilized world at that time. Due to its pre-Christ and pre-fall of Jerusalem date, the LXX cannot be accused of being influenced by any underlying animosity toward Christ or Christianity or desire to elevate Judaism’s claim to God’s blessings or the promised land. Most Christians believe the Masoretic Text (MT), upon which our English Old Testament is based, is written in the original Hebrew, but it too is a translation from the ancient and by then dead paleo-Hebrew Phoenician pictograph script into the modern Hebrew block script derived from Aramaic. The Masoretes completed it between 600 t0 1000 AD, by which time the Jews had become hostile to the Christian message, which shows up in various omissions, changes, and obfuscations of verses and passages that clearly point to Christ in the LXX. 

Jesus taught us that all scripture points to him (John 5:39). As a rule, the Septuagint more clearly points to Jesus than does the MT.

In the West, Christians have not questioned the MT since Jerome chose it as the basis for his Latin Vulgate Old Testament. The Eastern Orthodox Church, to their credit, never deviated from the Septuagint, preserving it for later generations to rediscover. Because of the power of tradition, it is quite difficult for many of us in the West to think of the LXX as being more trustworthy than the MT, but I have found that a side-by-side comparison indicates otherwise.

In this series of articles, I have undertaken to illustrate the similarities and differences between the MT and LXX by examining various passages. Below is another example. The Septuagint version I am using is the Lexham English Septuagint 2nd Edition. It is available in print or digitally through Logos Bible Software. Occasionally I reference Brenton’s translation, which is a good one, but the English is somewhat dated.

Masoretic Text Septuagint Significance

6 All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned, every one, to his own way; And the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all. Isaiah 53:6 (NKJV) 

6 We all have been misled like sheep; each person was misled in his own path, and the Lord handed him over for our sins. Isaiah 53:6 (LES2) 

I find this verse extremely interesting. The MT says we sheep have “gone astray,” but the LXX says we have been “led astray” or “misled.” The Greek word used for “misled” is planao, which means to “deceive” or “wander.” We get our English word for “planet” from it. Originally what we call planets were called wandering stars or planetes asteres in Greek. Isn’t interesting that every time a person calls the earth a planet, it is the same as saying the earth is a deception? 

Satan appeared to Eve in the form of a talking serpent and misled her to disbelieve God’s Word and choose to give allegiance to him by obeying his voice instead of God’s. The essence of sin is going our own way instead of being loyal to God. And we do that as a consequence of being misled and believing a lie. All sin is rooted in deception.

The MT next says that “the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.” This could be also translated, “has caused him to encounter our sins.” The LXX says the “the Lord handed him over (Greek – paradidomai) tor our sins.”  Both are true.

The idea of our sins being “laid on” Jesus hearkens back to the Old Testament practice of laying hands on a sacrifice so that the sins of the offerer became identified with the offering. This also happened for our benefit to Jesus. Paul wrote:

21 For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. 2 Corinthians 5:21 (NKJV) 

Regarding the LXX, interestingly, the NT speaks of Jesus being “handed over.” The same Greek verb, paradidomai, is used in the following verses. In these cases the word is translated as “delivered.”

1 When morning came, all the chief priests and elders of the people plotted against Jesus to put Him to death. 2 And when they had bound Him, they led Him away and delivered Him to Pontius Pilate the governor. Matthew 27:1–2 (NKJV) 

15 So Pilate, wanting to gratify the crowd, released Barabbas to them; and he delivered Jesus, after he had scourged Him, to be crucified. Mark 15:15 (NKJV) 

Isaiah’s prophecy, both in the MT and in the LXX, was perfectly fulfilled by Christ. In this case, both versions have something to tell us. 

7 He was oppressed and He was afflicted, Yet He opened not His mouth; He was led as a lamb to the slaughter, And as a sheep before its shearers is silent, So He opened not His mouth. Isaiah 53:7 (NKJV) 

7 And because he was afflicted, he does not open his mouth; like a sheep is led to slaughter, and like a lamb is voiceless before the one who shears it, so he does not open his mouth. Isaiah 53:7 (LES2) 

In the first part of this verse,  these two translations are essentially the same, except that the LXX and MT reverse the order of sheep and lamb. I tend to go with the MT on this one because John the Baptist called Jesus the “Lamb or God.” 

29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! John 1:29 (NKJV) 

Jesus, the Lamb of God, was led to the slaughter on the cross for the sins of the world (Greek – cosmos), not just for the Jewish people. God’s plan included the nations from the start. Including the nations was not some after thought or “parenthesis.”

On the side of the LXX, we who believe in Christ are his “sheep.” We too may be “led to the slaughter”  for our testimony to Christ. (Romans 8:36) In this sense, the LXX could be a reference to the church’s laying down its life for Christ. Just a thought.

8 He was taken from prison and from judgment, And who will declare His generation? For He was cut off from the land of the living; For the transgressions of My people He was stricken. Isaiah 53:8 (NKJV) 

8 His judgment was taken away in humiliation; who will describe his family? For his life was taken from the earth; he was led to death because of the lawless acts of my people. Isaiah 53:8 (LES2) 

The MT says, “He was taken from prison and judgment.” The LXX has, “His judgment was taken away in humiliation.” Once again, both seem to be true. Jesus may not have been literally in prison, but he was in the custody of the soldiers and the high priest. Righteous judgment was taken from him. He was publicly humiliated, according to the LXX, which is a recurring theme in that version of Isaiah. 

Jesus’ trial before the Sanhedrin was a travesty and a mockery. When he stood before Pilate, having been scourged, which was in itself extremely humiliating, the procurator said, “Behold the man.”  Jesus was paraded in front of the crowd in the most humiliating fashion. That same crowd demanded his crucifixion. They rejected our Lord as their Messiah preferring a murderer named Barabbas. Imagine the humiliation for the Creator – Redeemer – Sustainer – Lord ! 

Both the MT and LXX ask the question, “who will declare his generation” or “who will describe his family.” Because he was “cut off from the land or the living” or “his life was taken from the earth,” he had no natural progeny. This question will later be answered after the resurrection when those who believe on him are “born again” into God’s family, creating a new version of humanity. Jesus was the “second” or “last” Adam. (1 Corinthians 15:45)

The last part of the verse in the MT reads, “For the transgressions of my people he was stricken.” The LXX puts it this way, “he was led to death because of the lawless acts of my people.”  Luke records the following.

26 Now as they led Him away, they laid hold of a certain man, Simon a Cyrenian, who was coming from the country, and on him they laid the cross that he might bear it after Jesus. Luke 23:26 (NKJV) 

In my estimation, this verse goes to the LXX.

9 And they made His grave with the wicked— But with the rich at His death, Because He had done no violence, Nor was any deceit in His mouth. Isaiah 53:9 (NKJV) 

9 And I will give the wicked in place of his tomb, and the wealthy in place of death, because he committed no lawlessness, and there was no deceit in his mouth. Isaiah 53:9 (LES2) 

The wording of the first part of this verse is difficult in the LXX. Brenton’s translation put it as follows: “And I will give the wicked for his burial, and the rich for his death…” The MT is not much better. 

The MT said that Jesus had “done no violence.” The Hebrew word translated as “violence” can also mean “wrong.” The LXX says that Jesus committed no lawlessness.  Both are right, but I tend to like the LXX better. Both agree that Jesus never lied or led people astray.

In conclusion, although both the MT and the LXX offer insights into Christ’s suffering and death in the above verses, I lean toward the LXX on this one, as I do in most instances. 

7 …He was led as a lamb to the slaughter, And as a sheep before its shearers is silent, So He opened not His mouth. 8 He was taken from prison and from judgment, And who will declare His generation? For He was cut off from the land of the living; For the transgressions of My people He was stricken. Isaiah 53:7–8 (NKJV) 

7 …like a sheep is led to slaughter, and like a lamb is voiceless before the one who shears it, so he does not open his mouth. 8 His judgment was taken away in humiliation; who will describe his family? For his life was taken from the earth… Isaiah 53:7–8 (LES2) 

In Acts Chapter 8, the Ethiopian eunuch was reading from Isaiah 53:7-8 when Philip approached him and used these verses as a launching pad to preach the gospel. Here is the quote from the NT.

32 The place in the Scripture which he read was this: “He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; And as a lamb before its shearer is silent, So He opened not His mouth. 33 In His humiliation His justice was taken away, And who will declare His generation? For His life is taken from the earth.” Acts 8:32–33 (NKJV) 

It is clear that the quote came from the LXX, not the MT. The NT quote maintains the same order of sheep and lamb as does the LXX. The NT agrees with the LXX that Jesus’ judgment was taken way in humiliation. Both say that his life was taken from the earth. 

Though the English translation of the LXX and NT are slightly different, the Greek is the same. This shows that Luke used the LXX for his quote, not the MT.

Conclusion

If you want to know more about why Christians should prefer the Septuagint to the MT, click on this link. In another article, I share some of the things I have so far learned by making this comparison. As for me, I now prefer the LXX. It was Paul’s and the other apostles’ standard for Old Covenant truth, was used by synagogues in Jesus’s day,  and is most often quoted in the New Testament. That makes it good enough for me.

More articles comparing the Septuagint to the MT
Share this post...