Is There Some Way to Tell if I Am a True Believer?

follow me

 

 

 

 

God has provided us the means to ascertain if we are true believers in Christ. Paul wrote:

Examine yourselves to see if your faith is genuine. Test yourselves. Surely you know that Jesus Christ is among you; if not, you have failed the test of genuine faith. 2 Corinthians 13:5 (NLT) 

Paul exhorted the church in Corinth to take test to see if they were true followers of Christ. Wouldn’t it be great if it were as simple as answering a couple of questions? Unfortunately, people are adept at saying what they think others want to hear and putting on a false front for others to see. Churchgoers learn all the right answers, even if they do not come from the heart, and cover up struggles by putting on a smile when around other Christians. King David wrote that God seeks truth on the inside (Psalm 51:6), where he alone sees with perfect clarity.

O LORD, You have searched me and known me. 2  You know when I sit down and when I rise up; You understand my thought from afar. 3  You scrutinize my path and my lying down, And are intimately acquainted with all my ways. 4  Even before there is a word on my tongue, Behold, O LORD, You know it all. Psalm 139:1-4 (NASB)  

So, is there any way to know for sure if we are really a Christian or a self-deceived counterfeit?

Repentance and Baptism

When people come to Christ God may points out specific sins to us, which he wants us to stop committing; but, the larger and more important aspect of repentance is turning away from a self-directed lifestyle. Water baptism is a very huge step Jesus directs all his followers to take. The believer who submits to water baptism signals his or her allegiance to Christ, death to sin, and a leaving behind of the self-directed life.

We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life. Romans 6:4 (ESV) 

Going down into the water is a picture of our being united with Christ in his death. The coming up out of the water symbolizes the spiritual reality that we are identified with and participate in Christ’s resurrection. The remainder of our lives is to be lived in the power of Christ’s resurrection to the glory of God. This cannot happen unless we learn obedience, which is one of the most significant goals of the gospel.

Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages 26  but has now been disclosed and through the prophetic writings has been made known to all nations, according to the command of the eternal God, to bring about the obedience of faith— Romans 16:25-26 (ESV)

 

Lordship and Obedience

The “gospel” of personal salvation does not emphasize obedience. Instead it focuses on forgiveness, so much so that many people think they can continue to live a sinful lifestyle because God will be sure to forgive them. This is a sin of presumption: we presume on God’s mercy while being casual towards sin. While it is true that God is merciful and we are all sinners, the gospel does not give us a license to continue deliberately in a sinful lifestyle without making any attempt at cooperating with the Holy Spirit in the work of transformation. The fear of the Lord seems to be missing. People who do such things are either not saved at all or have in their future a somewhat scary encounter with the living God, who will discipline them as he sees fit in order to help them change.

For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives.” 7 It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? Hebrews 12:6-7 (ESV)

The true gospel, however, emphasizes the Lordship of Christ. People who grasp that Jesus is Lord over all things, especially over the lives of those who come to him for salvation, understand that obedience to him (loyalty) defines the relationship.

Truthfulness on the inside will produce loyalty in our behavior. Falsehood in the inside will produce a sinful lifestyle. What we are inside always comes to the surface eventually.

If Jesus is Lord, then we will say “yes” to him in every area of life. When we say “yes,” the Holy Spirit comes alongside us to help us live it out. If we only see Jesus as a savior, we may feel comfortable saying “no” to him. There is something extremely disingenuous and paradoxical when a follower of Christ says, “No, Lord.” Those two words do not ever properly go together.

Grace and Transformation

The true gospel of God’s grace transforms us from the inside out. It sets us apart to fulfill God’s purposes through the activity and power of the Holy Spirit in our lives. This always results in obedience to the Great Commission and in all the little details of life. Followers of Christ no longer belong to themselves. We have been bought and paid for by God through the death and resurrection of his Son.

Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, 20  for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body. 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (ESV) 

 

Grace and Obedience

Grace is sometimes misunderstood and equated with mercy. Mercy is when God does not punish us according to what our sins deserve. Because Christ already took the punishment for our sins upon himself, God no longer must pay us back in kind for our sins. His justice has already been served. Instead he works on an entirely different plane. He deals with his children in order to transform them into Christ’s image, bring glory to himself, and validate the gospel’s claims. A side benefit to us is that we experience great joy and fulfillment in the process. Sometimes he is extremely kind and patient with us. At other times, we may encounter the severity of God. God’s “woodshed” is not a place we want to visit.

Think about it. God is not glorified by disobedient Christians. When we disobey God, we fail to reflect Christ to a watching world. Our disobedience often gives unbelievers an excuse to reject the gospel. They may reason that the gospel is a hoax because we who profess to believe are behaving badly. Grace is God’s power working within the believer to enable him or her to obey. It really is that simple. The Holy Spirit is God’s Agent of grace to us. He indwells every child of God, empowering us to live the Christ life. This is an amazing secret to being God’s proper representatives in the world. Paul called it the “law of the Spirit of life.”

So now there is no condemnation for those who belong to Christ Jesus. 2  And because you belong to him, the power of the life-giving Spirit has freed you from the power of sin that leads to death. 3  The law of Moses was unable to save us because of the weakness of our sinful nature. So God did what the law could not do. He sent his own Son in a body like the bodies we sinners have. And in that body God declared an end to sin’s control over us by giving his Son as a sacrifice for our sins. 4  He did this so that the just requirement of the law would be fully satisfied for us, who no longer follow our sinful nature but instead follow the Spirit. Romans 8:1-4 (NLT)  
 

Testing the Genuineness of Our Faith

Many believers have never been taught that God’s Spirit can and will enable them to live a life of transformational obedience. The “gospel” of personal salvation sets us up to believe that God does not expect much from us on this side of the grave. He forgives us for our continuing failures and absolves us from taking his commands seriously. The true grace of God, however, encourages us to realize that after being released from the just condemnation our sins deserved, God empowers us by his Spirit to live a God-glorifying life of obedience.

For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, 12  training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age, 13  waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, 14  who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works. Titus 2:11-14 (ESV)

Which gospel did we receive? We can easily tell by checking our attitude toward obedience.

  • Do we realize that our lives no longer belong to us, or do we think we still have the right to direct our own affairs without reference to God?
  • Do we routinely excuse our sinful behavior because we do not believe God really cares that much whether we obey or not?
  • Are we aware of God’s working in our lives to set us free from sin in specific areas? If so, are we cooperating with God’s grace and living in the fear of the Lord?
  • Have we embraced God’s mission as our mission? Are we Great Co-Missionaries?

If we feel no need to surrender our lives and personal affairs to Christ, we may not be a true follower of Christ. If we feel no desire or conviction to repent from a self-directed life and from specific sins, we may not be a true child of God. If we feel fine about never sharing our faith, perhaps we do not have the Great Witness, the Holy Spirit, living inside us.

These are very real considerations. Perhaps examining our lives in this way makes us feel uncomfortable; nevertheless, it is a good thing for us to do so.

Examine yourselves to see if your faith is genuine. Test yourselves. Surely you know that Jesus Christ is among you; if not, you have failed the test of genuine faith. 2 Corinthians 13:5 (NLT) 

We do not earn our salvation through good works, but, if we are truly saved, good works will surely follow. This is because the Holy Spirit will inspire us to do these things and give us the inner power to accomplish them. That is what the law of the spirit of life does. As James put it: faith without works is dead. We demonstrate the reality of our faith through our good works done in love and faith via the power of God’s Spirit.

So you see, faith by itself isn’t enough. Unless it produces good deeds, it is dead and useless. 18  Now someone may argue, “Some people have faith; others have good deeds.” But I say, “How can you show me your faith if you don’t have good deeds? I will show you my faith by my good deeds.” James 2:17-18 (NLT)  

Sadly, the modern church has many people who have never been truly born again. They have never had their spiritual eyes opened to the revelation of Christ, who is both Savior and glorious Lord. They have never been filled with God’s Holy Spirit. They do not know personally what it means to be in relationship with God.

Three things help us to know if our faith is real.

  1. Have we believed the gospel in our hearts, rather than simply mentally agreeing with it?
  2. Do we have an inner “witness” from God’s Spirit that we belong to him?
  3. Do our lives give evidence of transformation and obedience to Christ?

If we cannot say yes to these three things, it is time for us to earnestly seek God until we have a breakthrough.

Keep on asking, and you will receive what you ask for. Keep on seeking, and you will find. Keep on knocking, and the door will be opened to you. 8  For everyone who asks, receives. Everyone who seeks, finds. And to everyone who knocks, the door will be opened. Matthew 7:7-8 (NLT)

 

Prayer

Lord Jesus, the Bible says that we can know that we have eternal life. You said that your sheep hear your voice. I want to know you in the deepest way possible. Holy Spirit please open my spiritual eyes, unstop my spiritual ears, and heal my hardened heart so that I may see Jesus for who he really is. Come, Lord Jesus, into my life as both Lord and Savior. Holy Spirit, transform me on the inside to make me an obedient child of God. I surrender every aspect of my life to you. I trust you to do in me what I cannot do for myself. Amen.

Between Babel and Beast

babel and the beast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Peter J. Leithart

This book grows in relevance as our nation declines spiritually, morally, and politically. It is difficult for an American Christian like myself to objectively view his or her country. We may not agree with the author’s points and conclusions, but followers of Christ must seriously consider America’s place as a world empire from a biblical perspective. We must also ponder that nearly every great empire throughout history has somehow managed to co-opt religion to its benefit. I hope you read this with an open mind and a repentant heart. I imagine it will be as difficult for you as it is for me to contemplate that we are a very flawed nation that is perhaps on the verge of catastrophe.

Part One: Empires in Scripture

Chapter One: A Tale of Two Imperialisms

The first chapter examines God’s resistance to man’s attempt to construct a nascent imperial empire at Babel. In opposition to Babel, God introduced his own plan for world order through Abraham.

God’s reign in Zion, not the city-and-tower of Babel, is the center of international order and the hope for global peace… Gentiles formed the boundary of Israel’s land, and as such they were incorporated as the frontier of Yahweh’s empire that had Zion at its capital… and this implied that the Gentile would eventually share in their redemption as light and life spread from Zion to the frontier, from Jew to Greek. (p.11)

Yahweh’s imperial program ran as a tangent to the history of Babel. Yahweh confronted Babel, but instead of sending a chosen army of holy warriors to plunder the great city, He founded His empire by calling Abram away from empire. (p.12)

All this was in preparation for uniting the nations to confess, with one lip, one great Name. (p.14)

…the Gospel of the kingdom is… the gospel of God’s imperium. (p.52)

Chapter Two: Rod, Refuge, Messiah, Beast

This chapter shows how…

The struggle of the Old Testament is not empire versus non-empire, but between rival imperialisms, rival visions for the political salvation of a human race divided linguistically, culturally, and religiously in the wake of the rebellion at Babel. This is why empire is always a seduction for Abraham’s children. For Israel, looking at Babel is like looking in the mirror. (p.33)

Babylon was renewed Babel, associated with the original program of imperial rebellion, false eschatology, sacrifice, and tyranny. (p.19)

When God sent his people into captivity in Babylon, he initiated a new phase of his plan for Israel.

More importantly, by resisting at crucial moments, Daniel and his friends broke the uniformity of Neo-Babelic worship and created fissures in the homogeneous political structure of Neo-Babel. Shemites who once cooperated in building Babel staked out a space of independence… Yahweh scattered citizens of his empire among the nations for a reason, not just to teach Israel a lesson, but to begin forming a martyr-people whose faithful resistance would remake Gentile empire. (p.22)

Leithart defines what it means for an empire to become “beastly.”

The Bible condemns violence, but bloodthirsty injustice is not, in itself, enough to make an empire a beast. Empires turn bestial when they begin to eat the people of God and drink their blood. (p.33)

Babelic empires are founded on the blood of innocents. Bestial empires are founded on the blood of the saints.  (p.53)

The Good News of Empire

Jesus heralded the kingdom or empire of God.

Every time Jesus spoke of Himself as “Son of Man,” He claimed to be the heir of imperial authority, the Emperor who fulfills God’s original anti-Babel imperial promise to Abraham. (p.37)

Leithart claims that God inverted Babel when the Holy Spirit fell on Pentecost.

The pneumatic church became God’s renewed imperium. The Spirit-filled church became the new Zion, the mountain from which Israel’s God rules, from which he reaches out to the Romans and barbarians. It is anti-Babel at nearly every point: many tongues, not one; scattering, not gathering; built on the blood of a willing victim; Jew and Gentile united in God’s work, not in opposition to Him. Yet the ecclesial imperium is at certain points a mirror image of Babel. All tribes, tongues, nations, and peoples confess with one lip that there is one Lord, Jesus. Jesus sends his Spirit to enliven the church as a multilingual, multi-ethnic, multinational empire. (p.38)

The church operates by vastly different ways from Babel type empires.

The fulfilled Israel of the church, by contrast, was founded by the victim not the victimizer. It was a city founded by crucified and risen Abel rather than Cain… The church’s sacrificial practice imitated that of Jesus, as willing martyr-victims mixed their blood with His. Renewal came through violence suffered, not violence enacted. (p.40)

Revelation envisions the delivery of the kingdoms of the world to the victors who overcome by faithful witness to death, the victors who follow Jesus-Victor to victory. (p.50)

Beast and harlot are cleared away to make room for the Bride.  Kings and empires are no longer chosen to shelter the church. Instead, the church as the fifth empire keeps its doors open day and night so that kings from across the sea will be able to enter and pay homage to the Son who reigns from Zion. (p.51)

Part Two: Americanism

Chapter Four: Heretic Nation

American is a new kind of human being… The American was a long time coming. Conceived by Luther, gestated by Calvin, he was born of the Puritan parents who begat America. It took thee labors to bring finally to birth – the English Civil War, from which American Puritans escaped, the American Revolution, and the American Civil War. From these emerged a new character type distinguished by a boundlessly optimistic sense of possibility and inventiveness, an extraordinary willingness to try, fail, and try again that has been the astonishment and envy of the world. He is generous, always ready to help. He is sentimental; even American warriors have a soft side. The American is fiercely independent; don’t tread on him, because he won’t be pushed around. He is willing to extend the same independence to others, to live and let live. The American has a dark side; He is utterly confident of the rightness of his every cause, infatuated with violence, insatiably hungry for novelty, not greedy for stuff so much as greedy for new stuff. He assumes that if the world were rightly ordered, it would look like global America and is bewildered by people who resist this utopia. Like most people, the American’s virtues and vices are sometimes hard to distinguish. (pp.57-58)

Christianity played a big part in shaping America because…

…it put forward a new and powerful ideal of community which called men to a life of meaningful participation… the church was an unprecedented social and political form, and it burst the bonds of all prior political categories. (p.59)

The early Puritan settlers conceived of themselves as representatives of God who established the colony…

“to serve the kingdom of God and advance the purposes of the gospel.” (p.67)

…for the Puritan colonists, America was not “just another plot of ground in a fallen world.” Rather, “The new World, like Canaan of old, belonged wholly to God. (p.68)

America was chosen to be the bearer of freedom and also of Christianity, and distinguishing the two was no longer easy to do. (p.74)

Over time, America’s mission changed from the earlier Puritan mission to advance the kingdom of God to the new mission of advancing American ideals.

…America is an inherently globalizing, universal nation. It cannot remain to itself and be itself… It is difficult to see how this is anything more than a sacralization of national interest: America exists to promote Americanism. (p.75)

The Civil War created a nation by a massive effusion of blood…The North offered this massive sacrifice to realize a vision of America’s future. “The contest on the part of the North is now undisguisedly for empire,” wrote a British journal in 1862. (p.79)

Lincoln…speculated that God might want the war to continue until every drop of slave blood is atoned for by the blood of a Union or Confederate solder…In general the war’s terrors and injustices were valorized by reference to Americanist typology and eschatology: mine eyes have seen to glory of the coming of the Lord…not to make men holy, but to make men free. (p.79)

The Revolutionary War had never shaped a coherent sense of the nation as a prevailing object of fealty, over against local communities and regions…Out of the carnage [of the Civil War] a national religion was born, a fresh commitment to the Union that Americans would defend to the death.

The church did not have enough critical distance from this Americanism to speak to it. Some traditional preachers did not address politics at all with the effect of leaving…

“the laity without a moral compass or guide… (p.80)

Sacrifice American style can only go on and on. For in Americanism, this fourth great biblical religion, there is no final sacrifice, no end to bloodshed, until we have rid the world of evil, until the Amer can creed becomes the creed of humanity. (p.81)

Chapter Five: Chanting the New Empire

This chapter compiles quotes from significant early leaders that show that empire was on their minds.

America’s Founding Fathers were not  anti-empire. Quite frequently, they stated the opposite. Washington described America in 1783 as a “rising empire,” and later predicted that the “infant empire” that was born from the Revolutionary War would one day have “some weight in the scale of Empires.” In Hamilton’s opinion, expressed in Federalist #1, America was “the most interesting” empire in the world, and in Federalist #11 he looked ahead to “a great American system, superior to the control of all trans-Atlantic force of influence, and able to to dictate the terms of connection between the Old and New World.” (p.86)

Thomas Jefferson describe our nation as an “Empire of Liberty.” American foreign policy could be called “imperial anti-colonialism.” (p.87) George Washington wrote:

If we remain one people under an efficient government, the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by our justice, shall counsel. (p.96)

In short, “during the period of American innocence and isolation,’ the United States had forces stationed on or near every major continent in the world; its navy was active in virtually every ocean, its troops saw combat on virtually every continent, and its foreign relations were in a permanent state of crisis and turmoil.” (p.97)

Congress maintained only a small navy whose peacetime mission was to police the world, enforcing Western standards of behavior,  protecting U.S. commerce, and serving as a general adjunct to U.S. diplomacy… In short, naval captains were doing more or less the same job performed today by the World Trade Organization: integrating the world around the principle of free trade. Freelance imperialism has been a recurring feature of American history. (p.103)

American expansion gained momentum as our nation adopted the belief in its “Manifest Destiny” to acquire all the land from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific by force of arms or otherwise. The author concludes this chapter:

In early American entanglements around the world, we acted neither more of less foolishly or wickedly than other nations have. Our treatment of the American Indians remains a dark blot on our history… Our problem is not so much the history itself as the mythology or ideology of Americanism that blinds us to the real force of our history. The heresy of Americanism is a shield that allows us to act like Babel while convincing ourselves that we are fulfilling a divine mission on behalf of the human race. Such blindness became more dangerous as America assumed its preminsnt place in the world. (p.109)

Part Three: Between Babel and Beast

Chapter 6: American Babel

The author asserts that in the 20th and 21st centuries the United States remained “nearly as religious as they ever were,” and her sense of purpose “remained as thoroughly infused by American eschatology as it had been in 1620 or 1789 or 1840, though her international actions had become more overtly imperial.” (p.115)

Commerce had expanded everywhere, so that American interests were global, and it should be U.S. policy to protect and promote commerce. (p.116)

The new world order requires a world police, and we should pay our share of the costs of watching the global neighborhood. (p.117)

I would argue that we assumed a lot more than our fair share. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State under President Eisenhower, believed that…

“peace and civilization would only survive if the United States…exercised dominance over the globe.” (p.120)

“American policy must establish, ensure, and maintain, the dominance of America.” (p.121)

This is a Babelic stance. America conceived of herself as the

“indispensable nation” whose “job is to change the world, and in its own image.” (Condoleeza Rice, p.122)

“We believe everyone should be like us, and we believe that everyone wants to be. And we take steps to help them become like us, sometimes whether they want to or not.” (p.123)

Like Babel, we claim to guarantee international order, but often spread confusion. (p.125)

Americanist ideology gives sacred cover to our pursuit of national interest. (p.125)

He concludes:

When we violently impose our will on the world, we are acting against the better angels of our nature. But we are not betraying our true selves. We are being as Americanist as apple pie. (p.135)

Chapter 7: Among Beasts

This is for me the most sobering chapter, especially in light of increasing Antisemitism and anti-Christian rhetoric by citizens and government leaders. The author states:

America is not a beast, but Americanism could adapt itself to bestial ideology. Though we are not a beast, we enjoy the company of beasts; we send them money, train their soldiers, and have even permitted beasts to write constitutions that leave them free to be beasts. (p.137)

This, of course, relates to our bedfellow relationship with some Islamic nations that hinges upon our strategic and economic interests. The author concludes:

For much of the last century, the United States has forged alliances with repressive despots. During the Cold War, we thought we needed the brutes to stave off the Red Menace. Now, as we wage the war of terror, we say we need friendly beasts to help us deal with the less friendly ones… Realism of this type is not only foolish, but it puts us on the path of great evil…We fund our favorite beasts, then turn a blind eye when they devour the saints. It is a dangerous position, not only for the Christians who suffer at the hands of our allies, but also for the United States. Those who consort with beasts might become bestial, and beasts do not long survive. (p.150)

Conclusion

The author states that “as far as Christians are concerned, the only appropriate response is to repent of being Americanists.” (p.151) He suggests removing the American flag from our podiums and beginning to preach the imperium of the church rather than the U.S.

Throughout Scripture, the only power that can overcome the seemingly invincible omnipotence of a Babel or a Beast is the power of martyrdom, the power of witness to King Jesus to the point of loss and death. American Christianity has not done a good job of producing martyrs, and that is because we have done such an outstanding job of nurturing Americanists who regret that they have only one life to give for their country. (p.152)

Shall America devolve into a beastly nation before our Lord’s Second Coming? We are definitely trending that way. I love my country, but it is important for us to realize that as Christians we can only give conditional allegiance to everything besides Jesus. He is the only one who deserves our unconditional loyalty.

Dear brothers and sisters, pattern your lives after mine, and learn from those who follow our example. 18  For I have told you often before, and I say it again with tears in my eyes, that there are many whose conduct shows they are really enemies of the cross of Christ. 19  They are headed for destruction. Their god is their appetite, they brag about shameful things, and they think only about this life here on earth. 20  But we are citizens of heaven, where the Lord Jesus Christ lives. And we are eagerly waiting for him to return as our Savior. 21  He will take our weak mortal bodies and change them into glorious bodies like his own, using the same power with which he will bring everything under his control. Philippians 3:17-21 (NLT)

Prayer

Jesus, we acknowledge that you alone are Lord and that the nations are a drop in the bucket in your eyes. We believe that your hand has been upon our nation for good in many ways, but we also acknowledge that we have been far, far from perfect. Lord, do not let our love for our country blind us to her faults. Neither let us become anti-American. Lord, we pray for our nation and its leaders. Help us to be a force for good in the world. Forgive us for the many times we have pursued our national self-interest above your principles. Keep us from becoming a beastly nation. As your followers, help us to reserve unconditional loyalty for you alone. If necessary, help us to resist anyone and anything that would try to break that loyalty and allegiance. Jesus, you alone are Lord. Amen.

The Shape of Practical Theology

shape

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Ray S. Anderson

The subtitle of this book, Empowering Ministry with Theological Praxis, tells the reader that this book is eminently practical, which is what I discovered. Anderson shows that theology can only be developed properly in the context of real life ministry. Theoretical theology, divorced from the complexities of fallen humanity, can lead to some harmful and erroneous positions that fail to demonstrate redemptive love and grace to profoundly flawed people, who have made serious mistakes (sins) in their lives and have reaped the consequences.I have emphasized sentences that are particularly seminal.

Anderson gives us a framework for developing a practical biblical theology that takes into consideration the activity of God’s Spirit in people’s lives, just as Peter and Paul did.

Anderson defines praxis as “truth in action.”

Praxis, then, reveals theology in a very tangible form. In this sense, actions are themselves theological and as such are open to theological reflection and critique. Thus the praxis of the church is in fact the embodiment of its theology… Praxis is an action that includes the telos or final meaning and character of truth. It is an action in which the truth is discovered through action, not merely applied or “practiced.” (p.48-49)

Is this not why Jesus will judge people according to their actions. Actions reveal what we really believe.

The author gives an example from Jesus’ ministry.

When Jesus experienced the work of God through a miraculous healing on the sabbath (John 9), he argued that the truth of the sabbath was to be found in the restoration of humanity, not in keeping the law of the sabbath. When challenged by the Pharisees…, he responded, “The sabbath was made for humankind, not humankind for the sabbath.” (Mark 2:27) This is what is meant by praxis. The work of God in our midst discloses to us the word of God, even as the Word of God reveals its truth producing God’s work. (p.51)

Praxis is not merely a “practice” involving the making of a product or application of theoretical knowledge; it means discerning the truth as  final outcome of one’s action. The action itself contains its own good end, and if the end is not “good,” the action cannot be the right one. For example, when Jesus healed on the sabbath, he was acting in accordance with the telos of the sabbath – that is, God’s purpose for the sabbath, reconciliation and restoration of life to its God-intended value. This was praxis. (p.239)

The kingdom of God is revealed through a praxis that embodies the telos, or maturity, or a life through its actions. The New Testament Greek world teleios (mature, perfect) was used by those who translated the Old Testament into Greek (the Septuagint) to render the Hebrew word salem (shalom), which means “sound, complete, whole.” (p.239)

The author argues that theology that is divorced from a critical reflection of God’s actions in the world borders on idolatry.

The continued presence and work of the Holy Spirit constitute the praxis of Christ’s resurrection. This means that the truth of resurrection is not only the fact an historical event but the presence and power of a resurrected person, Jesus Christ… Following Pentecost the early church interpreted the praxis of the Holy Spirit as the continued ministry of the risen Christ… Christopraxis…upholds the full authority and objectivity of the divine word as written in holy Scripture but only because Scripture itself is contingent on the being of God as given to us through the incarnate Word. Should one wish to dissolve the contingency into a Word of God that exists as a sheer objectification of truth detached from God’s being, it would be done at the peril of idolatry, in my judgment. (pp.51-53)

Jesus has not simply left us a set of teachings. He has done that. But in addition, he continues to teach. Discovering this teaching is itself a hermeneutical task, not merely an exercise in historical memory… the resurrected Jesus as the living Lord is a continuing hermeneutical criterion for interpreting the Word of God. (p.84,87)

Practical theology integrates the “objective” truth of Scripture with the actions of the Holy Spirit. If our theology does not account for what the Holy Spirit does, our theology must be altered, lest we become as the Pharisees whose messianic theology could not accommodate Christ and his actions. An easily understood example would be how the doctrine of cessationism fails to account for the present day activity of the Spirit. The choice has to be made between doctrine and the Spirit’s work. How to navigate such a crisis is the theme of this book.

It is a tension between the new humanity and the new order, which is always and already present through the Holy Spirit, and the old order, in which we have received the command of God but which must give way to the new. (p.89)

Where there is a tension within Scripture between the now and the not yet… a proper interpretation of scriptural authority as a rule of faith must take into account the presence and work of the risen Christ within his church. (p.91)

Women in Ministry as an Example of the Need of Practical Theology

Anderson’s book is designed to help us navigate the difficult exegetical waters of some key questions confronting the church, one of which is the role of women in ministry. As I see it, there are three ways to approach this issue. One is to adopt a strict complementarian approach that insists that men hold all positions and roles of authority in the church. On the opposite end of the spectrum are those who hold the egalitarian position that women are free to hold any and every position or role in the church. In the middle are those who think that the Bible generally teaches that men are called to be in authority positions, but women are free to minister in any area and are sometimes called to have authority. What is at issue here are scriptures which seem to clearly teach that women should hold a subordinate role in the church when it come to authority matters posed against Paul’s assertion that in Christ there is neither male nor female. (I am deliberately not including the details of this debate.) Anderson argues the following: since…

New Testament evidence is not unanimous as to teaching forbidding women to exercise pastoral leadership and ministry in the church, the issue cannot be settled on a textual exegesis alone… The situation is not unlike that which confronted Peter. On the one hand he had the Old Testament teaching that God’s gracious election was restricted to the Jews… On the other hand he had the teaching of the Lord himself that pointed toward offering Cornelius and his household full parity in the gospel. The issue was settled for him when the Spirit fell on the assembled people while he was yet speaking. (p.92)

Using this logic, Anderson insists that we must recognize the divine call on women whom God clearly raises up to serve in pastoral ministry.

To refuse to ordain women to pastoral ministry would be to refuse to recognize the freedom of the Lord as manifested through his work…in the church today. (p.93)

Recognizing that the Spirit indeed calls, equips, and places women into pastoral ministry does not do violence to the scriptures that men generally are called to lead and hold authority. What it does is make room for the Spirit to apply a “resurrection reality” to the present time as he may choose. We also have a scriptural precedent in how God raised up Deborah to judge and command Israel, having authority over its leading general.

Circumcision and the Need for Re-examination of Doctrine

The issue of circumcision wracked the early church. The Old Testament clearly insisted that it was a clear and non-negotiable mark of covenant inclusion. When Peter and Paul observed the Holy Spirit fall upon uncircumcised Gentiles, they realized that their theology of circumcision was not in agreement with the Spirit’s activity. Whenever this happens, we are driven to reexamine the Word of God to see if there is something we missed, some scriptural precedent which foreshadowed what the Spirit is doing. This is what Paul did. He realized that God justified Abraham by faith before he was ever circumcised. This gave the apostle the scriptural basis for properly interpreting the present work of the Spirit and gave rise to the doctrine of justification by faith. Paul blended his exegesis of Scripture with the observed activity of God’s Spirit. If we fail to do this, we separate…

the word of God from the work of God, a practice against which the apostle Paul warned in his letter to the Roman church. (Romans 14:20) (p.99)

For Anderson,

Theological reflection must be a “way of seeing” as well as a way of thinking. (p.103)

When Peter defended baptizing in water Cornelius and his family to the resident theologians in Jerusalem,

His defense was not based on clever exegetical reading of the Scriptures but on the compelling praxis of the Spirit revealed through his ministry of witness to the resurrection power of Jesus. (p.104)

What the author is saying is that the Spirit takes what is real in Christ, some of which is yet to be fully revealed in the resurrection, and brings it into our present historical context as he sees fit.

The Spirit that comes to the church comes out of the future, not the past. The presence of the Spirit is the anticipation of the return of Christ. (p.105)

Anderson states:

As nearly as I can see, for every case in which eschatological preference was exercised by the Spirit in the New Testament church, there was a biblical antecedent for what appeared to be revolutionary and new. (p.109)

Furthermore, the Spirit’s eschatological preference always works toward realizing God’s original purpose for humanity. (p.111)

The church is created and recreated through the praxis of the Spirit, liberating it from its conformity to nature and culture and its tendency to institutionalize the Word. (p.112)

In the person of Jesus there was a spiritual integrity that revitalized the spirit of human persons amidst the dead weight of tradition and legalism; where Jesus was there was life… He liberated the spirit from the law and created children of God out of slaves. He lifted the burden of the law by fulfilling it, not by breaking it, and pointed beyond it to a higher fulfillment. (p.169)

Applying these truths, Anderson states:

Where the Spirit of Christ prevails, there can no longer be discrimination  based on race, gender, or economic status. (Galatians 3:28) There can be no acts of favoritism…

The church repents by engaging in theological reflection on the work of God’s Spirit under the mandate of God’s Word… The church repents when it brings out new wineskins of worship and weaves new patterns of communal life out of the “unshrunk cloth” of the next generation. (p.182)

If the church is to be the redemptive presence and power in the world that God intends, it will be where the Spirit of Christ crossed the boundary and breaks through the wall that separates us from each other. (pp.185-6)

The church itself should seek to become the church that Christ desires to find when he comes, where distinctions of race, religion, ethnicity, economic and political status, and gender identity will no longer be found in the church and its apostolic life. (p.194)

These are bold words indeed. Clearly this will be the reality of the new creation at Christ’s return. Is the author correct in assuming that the Spirit is working to introduce that future reality into the historical present? I believe so.

Practical Theology as Paraclesis

The third section of the book seeks to apply what has been previously asserted.

The church has tended to stress two forms of the ministry of the Word of God; kerygma, the Word proclaimed; and didache, the Word taught. This leaves paraclesis, the ministry of encouragement or exhortation, to the Holy Spirit. This way of thinking separates the rational form of the Word from the relational. (p.195-6)

Interestingly, since I assume that Anderson is not charismatic, he does not mention that the gift of prophecy also fulfills this aspect of Christ’s ministry of the word – edification, exhortation, and comfort. (1 Corinthians 14:3) These aspects of Word ministry are often associated with the pastoral ministry. Anderson beautifully asserts:

Through the paracletic presence of the Holy Spirit, Jesus himself takes up my cause as his own. (p.197)

This paracletic ministry of Christ through the Spirit does not leave me as an individual but incorporates me into the fellowship of the body of Christ, the missionary people of God. (p.199)

Anderson writes:

A theology that does not begin and end with grace both from God’s side as well as from the human side is a theology that binds “heavy burdens” (Matthew 23:4) and sets a “yoke of slavery” (Galatians 5:1) on those who look for freedom and forgiveness. (p.202)

The litmus test of theology is not only what it says of God but what it does to persons when it is preached, taught, and practiced. (p.202)

The strategy of paracletic ministry in nonnegotiable in terms of advocacy for persons who suffer from discrimination, oppression, and human torment of any kind. (p.203)

The authentic charism that empowers is Christ’s power that redeems humanity from the social, political, and institutional forms of power that dehumanize. (p.204)

Theological Ethics and Pastoral Care

This section deals with how to deal with ambiguity regarding how to uphold the moral law while showing mercy. Anderson asserts:

God’s moral will is directed toward the goal of human life, and his moral laws are given so as to direct us toward that goal. If God himself were present in every case when it appears that moral laws collide, we would instinctively turn to him for assurance as to the best moral decision. This appears to be the way Jesus functioned… [as in the case of the woman caught in adultery]… He assumed that his presence was the presence of the freedom of God’s moral will to become the advocate for the human person. This advocacy clearly did not mean justifying the situation or the immoral actions…, but facilitating the restoration and liberation of the person to realize God’s moral will. (p.219)

Liberation from disease or demons is not an end in itself. Rather, the true end of liberation is the empowerment of the person to stand against prevailing evil [by faith] with a spiritual and moral assurance that she or he is not cut off from  God’s moral and spiritual good. (p.227)

Effective liberation, the goal of moral advocacy, is accomplished with the binding of the one who is estranged to the community of those who rest in God’s moral good of forgiveness and community. (p.230)

The way of wisdom is the telos that reaches into the actions (praxis) of therapy to enable the client to establish a coherent meaning to life. This itself can be transforming, even  when not every situation can be transformed. There are losses that can only be grieved…The moral law supports moral judgements in such cases. But the moral law does not itself contain wisdom’s freedom to provide healing and restoration… the church… will need to offer restoration and renewal to those who have no moral standing… The tension between upholding the divine order in its perfection and upholding the divine intention in restoring humanity is a praxis of moral wisdom. (pp.241-242)

That last sentence is one of the best thoughts of the book and challenges us to go beyond an intellectual application of rigid orthodoxy and venture into the realm where Jesus ministered, where we learn from the Spirit how to properly apply God’s truth in a redemptive and restorative way whenever possible.

The Normal Christian Life

normal christian life

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Watchman Nee

I read this book in the 1970s as a new disciple. It profoundly shaped my understanding of the meaning of Romans 5-8. Over the years I have come to understand what a blessing that was, since many people have never benefited from such teaching. I decided to reread Nee’s work and write this summary since it is one of the very top books on my recommended reading list. I was not disappointed as I reacquainted myself with Nee’s teaching. In order to make this article brief, I will severely limit quotations from the book in the hope that you will read it for yourself.

watchman neeFor those of you not familiar with Watchman Nee, his real name was Nee Shu-tsu, whose English name was Henry Nee. He was born of second-generation Christian parents in Foochow, China in 1903. At the age of 17 he gave his life to Jesus, forever altering his plans. He was well-educated and had great aspirations in life, but he realized that becoming a Christian meant surrendering everything to God. He had previously considered Christian work to be a low occupation that was beneath him. He spent the rest of his life preaching, teaching, and writing. In 1952 he was falsely accused and imprisoned by the Communists. He died in a work camp in 1972. A prison guard found a scrap of paper in his cell after his death on which was written:

Christ is the Son of God who died for the redemption of sinners and resurrected after three days. This is the greatest truth in the universe. I die because of my belief in Christ. Watchman Nee.

By the time Watchman Nee was arrested in 1952, approximately four hundred local churches had been raised up in China. In addition, over thirty local churches had been raised up in the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. Today there are over twenty-three hundred local churches worldwide because of the rich and faithful ministry of Watchman Nee.

The Normal Christian Life was put together by his disciples from various messages Nee preached. It lays out what every believer in Christ is privileged to have by faith in the crucified and risen Savior and Lord. Nee primarily uses Romans 5-8 as his launching pad to lay out four crucial aspects of Christ’s finished work.

  1. The blood of Christ to deal with sins and guilt.
  2. The cross of Christ to deal with sin, the flesh and the natural man.
  3. The life of Christ made available to indwell, recreate and empower man.
  4. The working of death in the natural man that that indwelling Life may be progressively manifest.

(Nee, Watchman. The Normal Christian Life (Kindle Locations 2328-2333). CLC Publications. Kindle Edition.)

The first two of these aspects are remedial. They relate to the undoing of the work of the devil and the undoing of the sin of man. The last two are not remedial but positive, and relate more directly to the securing of the purpose of God. The first two are concerned with recovering what Adam lost by the Fall; the last two are concerned with bringing us into, and bringing into us, something that Adam never had. Thus we see that the achievement of the Lord Jesus in His death and resurrection comprises both a work which provided for the redemption of man and a work which made possible the realization of the purpose of God. (Kindle Locations 2333-2337)

You will find amazing insights in this book that, with the help of the Holy Spirit’s revelation and inner work, will revolutionize your thinking and life.

The last chapter is one that I have remembered for nearly fifty years and which profoundly influenced my desire to serve Christ unreservedly. I leave it to you to read it for yourself.

Seeing Ghosts through God’s Eyes

ghosts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Mark Hunnemann

My friend, Mark Hunnemann, has authored a much needed Christian worldview analysis of earthbound spirits that addresses the current explosion of interest in ghosts and other paranormal phenomena. Being troubled by a lack of thoughtful analysis within the paranormal community and the unquestioning acceptance of the underlying tenets associated with believing in ghosts by many supposed Bible believing Christians, he felt compelled to write this book.

Mark opens the book by addressing the burgeoning interest in the subject of ghosts. He next lays out what a worldview is and why it is important to approach this topic through the grid of a biblical worldview, since it is the only one that can satisfactorily answer the deepest questions about life and eternity. He then takes the reader through the major topics associated with a worldview analysis, showing why belief in ghosts is antithetical to what the Bible teaches and why ghosts, as defined by the paranormal community, cannot exist.

Mark first demonstrates that a belief in ghosts is at odds with what the Bible teaches about God the Father. The paranormal definition of a ghost is a trapped earthbound spirit. There are various criteria which are generally accepted for why a person might be trapped, which are generally related to the traumatic nature of their death and any unfinished business that might have existed. Mark shows that such a definition must allow for millions and millions of people to become ghosts due to wars, persecutions, and the fragility of life. Such a definition makes spiritual orphans out of these wandering spirits.

All the data shows that ghosts express no connection or interest in God the Father at all. Rather these spirits are self-absorbed loners with a lack of any redeeming qualities, which possess decidedly anti-God and demonic traits. Mark begins in this section of his book to make his case that what are called ghosts are actually demons.

Next Mark looks at how belief in ghosts undermines the biblical doctrine of God’s sovereignty. Rather than God’s being in control of the eternal destinies of all people, according to ghost doctrine, many people end up trapped, perhaps for all eternity, in a kind of limbo state. In this state somehow they manage to avoid both heaven and hell; although, such an existence could be called hell. In this paranormal existence, babies can coexist with men and women who were monsters during their life on earth as regular humans.

Mark shows how such a belief in ghosts actually strips people of hope.

The next area Mark examines is our purpose in life, which is to love God and people. Ghosts show no such emotions or desires to help others. Ghosts seem to have no purpose in life (or should I say afterlife?). During his earthly ministry, Jesus expressed no knowledge or interests in ghosts. If indeed there are vast numbers of trapped spirits all around us who have no way to cross over into their eternal habitation, would not it be expected that Jesus, the Savior, would have helped these “people”?

On the other hand, Jesus had many encounters with demons. Mark once again shows how the only reasonable explanation for ghost activity is demonic.

Hunnemann warns the reader that what is passed off as benign encounters with ghosts is actually dangerous involvement with demons, who are cleverly disguising themselves in order to lure people into ever deepening darkness and oppression.

The next worldview area Mark examines involves history. The Bible teaches that we are given a certain amount of time as humans in which to live our lives, after which death is decisive in determining our destiny. The idea of trapped earthbound spirits wandering for eons is inconsistent with what the Bible teaches in this regard. Christians already participate in eternal life while still here on earth, being seated with Christ in heavenly places. How then would it be possible for us to be trapped in a nether world where we would be separated from God’s presence and power?

The belief in ghosts is incompatible with the biblical doctrine of the believer’s union with Christ.

Next the book looks at the basis for morality as it intersects with belief in ghosts. Mark shows how morality must be based either in an external frame of reference, such as the Bible, or it rests upon the subjective determination of individuals.

If Biblical morality is accepted, communication with ghosts (the dead) is prohibited. Necromancy, as it is called, is strictly forbidden in the Scripture. Mark writes that God bans such communication because it is actually communication with demons, something which is very dangerous and destructive.

In the past, necromancy was practiced by a fringe group in society, but with the surge of interest in ghost hunting, thousands of people see this practice as normal, interesting, and adventurous.

Mark spends some time writing about what are called shadow figures and shows that they must certainly be demons since they have no light, prefer to slink about in the shadows, and universally inspire fear. He examines the notion that ghosts are trapped human spirits, but shows that they do not exhibit common human traits, especially godly traits, which the Bible calls the fruit of the Spirit.

Mark also shows that what is called poltergeist activity has all the earmarks of the demonic; even though the paranormal community relegates it to being some sort of telekinesis subconsciously practiced by disturbed individuals.

Likewise, Mark shows that what the paranormal community calls residual hauntings, energy imprints left as a result of some traumatic event, cannot possibly be unintelligent. In addition they clearly contradict the second law of thermodynamics (entropy) which states unequivocally that all energy dissipates without outside intervention and control. By refusing to acknowledge that such things are actually demonic, those who posit ghosts and other non-demonic spirit activity find themselves at odds with real science and with the biblical worldview.

Mark next shows that ghosts (demons) lack essential traits associated with being human. Human beings have a dualistic nature: they are capable of acts of kindness while at the same time being quite capable of doing evil.

Ghosts, as they are called, do not show the good side of human nature at all. They are also quite limited in their ability to communicate. Some ghosts appear to be capable of throwing rocks and other heavy objects, but never lift a hand to assist another person.

Mark shows that human beings who were kind-natured would be expected to have the same traits after becoming a ghost, but no such activity has been recorded among what are called ghosts. Mark also shows that ghosts show no flair or ability to be creative, but this is not surprising if these beings are actually demons, whose mission is to kill, steal, and destroy, according to the Bible.

Lastly, ghosts show no interest in, longing for, or love for God – something very common in humans.

The last major area Mark covers concerns what happens after we die. Jesus taught clearly that after death believers go to a place of blessing; whereas, evil people go to a place of torment. There is a great chasm between the two so that no one can cross over from one place to another, nor can they go back to communicate with loved ones who are still alive on earth. (See the parable of the rich man and Lazarus in Luke’s gospel.) Jesus spoke of heaven and hell being the only two options, and, since he actually rose from the dead, he must know of which he speaks.

One cannot believe in Christ’s teaching about the afterlife and at the same time maintain a belief in ghosts.

If, as some affirm, it is possible to communicate with the ghosts of John Wilkes Booth and Adolf Hitler, then where is God’s justice? If these human spirits are still wandering and have escaped God’s judgment, this renders God impotent.

Mark concludes:

Simply believing in ghosts becomes part of ones spirituality, even if at first it plays a minimal role…The concept of ghosts is not merely at odds with a few passages of scripture (as significant as that would be); it is contrary to every aspect of the biblical worldview. Indeed without fear of exaggeration, I can say that it is actually hostile to true spirituality. The introduction to the belief in earthbound spirits into a person’s mind has an unsettling effect on everything else. Starting with the undermining of God as our Father, and the belittling of Christ, this concept also diminishes the finished work of Christ on the cross. (p.234-5)

I recommend this book to anyone who wishes to have a better understanding on the subject. Mark brilliantly weaves the Christian worldview into the book so that he communicates the Gospel very well under the format of writing about ghosts. This makes the book an exceptional outreach tool. I can envision using it as a “book club” offering or developing a discussion group around the contents. This book cannot be read lazily or skimmed. Mark took a great deal of time to put it together. It would do the book an injustice to fail to study it and think deeply about its contents. Thanks, Mark, for doing a superb job.

The Supernatural Skyline

supernatural skyline

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Jim Hylton

Jim Hylton has been in church leadership for more than fifty years. He had pastored and led conferences worldwide and brings a broad and deep perspective to the reader. The crux of the book is that in times past the church has sought revival when it should have pursued the kingdom of God. Revivals come and go, but the kingdom continues to unfold without end.

I have come to the conclusion that receiving a Kingdom is far better than praying down revival. (p.213)

This is a simple idea, but don’t let that deter you from reading it. It is packed with insight that inspires. Hylton writes that the supernatural skyline is where heaven meets earth. Where heaven meets earth is where the church connects with the community on mission for Christ.

We have done a far better job telling people how to let Jesus in than we have in telling them how to let Jesus out. Letting Jesus out is letting the life and love He shares with us be shared again with others. The Kingdom coming creates a love-based behavior for all we do. This love-based motivation becomes the order for church life born out of the Kingdom overlay of purpose. Reaching out to people is based on what God can do for them, not what they can do for us. (p.204)

Recovering the Blueprints of the Kingdom

Nowhere does Jesus suggest that we should be praying, “Your church be built;” but, instead, “Your kingdom come.” In fact when Jesus introduced the Church later on, He indicated that He would build it (see Matt. 16:18). Our focus is always to be on the Kingdom. Seeking first the Kingdom carries the serendipity of everything else being added that is needed. We seek the Kingdom. He builds the church. (p.52)

Citing Bob Roberts, the pastor of Northwood Church in North Fort Worth, Texas, Hylton writes:

It is his love for Christ that gives him a love for missions, but missions is not about building the Church, but building the Kingdom. He teaches the family of God at Northwood that “they do not do missions; they are the mission.” Wherever they are, they are on mission, starting at home with good family relationships, at work with good work ethics, in their neighborhoods, in their cities, and on to the nations of the world…The original plan was allowing Christ’s life to create an order of authority and life that is the reenactment of Himself. His presence brings His Kingdom. His power brings His benefits to all who will receive them. (pp.53-55)

Addressing the propensity of God’s people to seek out superstar preachers rather than experience Kingdom life, he writes:

Preaching can easily become a verbal art form. People attend church like people who walk through art galleries, admiring the skills of the artist. Verbal artistry can leave people with the enjoyment of the art of communication and void of the experience of hearing God’s voice. Richard F. Lovelace, professor of Church history at Gordon Conwell Seminary, says of another generation needing a fresh encounter with God: “Many American congregations were in effect paying their ministers to protect them from the real God.” (p.62)

The author’s roots are in evangelical Christianity, and part of his journey has been coming to terms with the reality of God’s power and gifts being for today. He insightfully states:

When the church is not really concerned about hurting people, it has no sense for the need of the supernatural. The institutional church is more concerned in maintaining credibility and fostering success and image. When we “let this mind be in us that was in Christ” (Phil. 2:5) and start ministering as He did, we will gladly welcome all the supernatural power available. (p.83)

Losing the War in the Wrong Battle

Hylton addresses the hideous monster of church tradition which often rears its head to oppose the work of God’s Spirit, as it has always done through the ages. He writes:

The god of Christian religion is tradition. Though the tradition may be rich and heart-warming, if it is an outward form without a personal relationship to the living Lord, it is just a religion under a new name… Every awakening precipitates a “wineskin war” because old wineskins begin to crack and tear from the energy of fermenting new wine. Threatened wineskins must be defended by those whose commitment is to the “cause” rather than to the Kingdom…behind the protest, there is usually a threatened existence of a wineskin that no longer flexes under Christ’s rule. (pp.116-117)

Who’s Who in the Kingdom

In this chapter, Hylton addresses our identity in Christ.

Christ in us is the eternal purpose of God being fulfilled by his incarnation being extended beyond one life to every life willing to receive this gift of God. Mary had to decide if she would open her life to receive His life in her. So do we. This treasure of Heaven in us makes our lives clay pots housing His infinite worth. (p.136)

Everything he [Jesus] did was done because he knew who he was. His father told him, “You are my beloved son” and he believed him. Our problem in answering the question, “Who are you?” is usually the issue that most needs to be settled. Either we have never heard the Father tell us who we are, or we have heard and thought it was too good to be true, or we have heard and then forgotten what we heard. (p.141)

It was in this awakened state of mind that I realized that not only was I not a “saved sinner,” I was actually an new creation in Christ and appeared to God always in the clothing of Christ’s righteousness…I would not achieve righteousness by my performance. I would receive righteousness by my faith… Understanding our righteous identity with God allows us to know the peace of God. Peace covers our feet and allows us to walk with comfort. No wonder we are often immobile in moving to touch the lives of others. We are foot weary instead of having “happy feet” covered in peace… How we see ourselves always regulates how we treat others. Loving our neighbors comes out of loving ourselves. Jesus made that clear. When we have low self-esteem, we have low value for those for whom Christ gave His life. Our value is seen by Christ’s payment for us in his life and death. (pp.143-147)

The Gospel with an Attitude

Here Hylton addresses the importance of our posture. He writes:

His [Paul’s] gospel was not only the truth about the person and finished work of Christ, but was also the presence of Christ, who was there to speak for himself. He knew that Christ came and spoke for himself to him…We must see that the presence of Christ embodies the Gospel, as well as the true facts about Him. The facts about his perfect life, his death to pay for our sin, and his return to life in the resurrection victory are important. Never can they be discounted. We can declare Him. But we cannot re-present him. Only he can present himself. The content of the Gospel is important. The person of the Gospel is essential… Presence evangelism is the most impacting experience in evangelism. (pp.156-161)

When he [Jesus] declared, “The kingdom is at hand,” he was saying, “This is a mobile business. We will come where you are. House calls are made and deliveries are without charge.” Church as most of us have known it is something you go to. The Kingdom comes to us and to others through us. (p.163)

When the Kingdom Comes – Where Does It Go?

Here Hylton compares and contrasts our past emphasis on revival in churches to the coming of the Kingdom in an area. He writes:

We had grown accustomed to the Lord visiting us, and with his visitation, people came to bask in his presence. Now he didn’t come to us as regularly or as intently. We were going to where he was hanging out. His location surprised us at times… We were pioneering a day when the Body of Christ is more about Kingdom connections than church divisions. Successful Church life was not as high a priority as Kingdom expressions… Jesus is indeed disguised in the needs of others waiting for our helping hand. Kingdom hands are extended to others rather than just gripping what we already have. We need to lose our grip on what we cling to. (pp.177-183)

The final chapters of the book address the need to see and have faith for the Kingdom and the things that try to block that.

That Emmaus road experience is repeated by many who walk with a comparative stranger all day. They talk about Christ. Finally they awaken and discover that they were talking about him when they could have been talking to him (see Luke 24:13-31). He is here with us – even within us. He is our companion in this journey. He is here to be enjoyed, and he wants to share his life with us. (p.225)

Hylton also writes about dysfunctional patterns in the church that try to lock us out of truly experiencing kingdom life. He calls it an “orphan mentality,” which is a lie-based stronghold that obstructs our seeing God as our loving Father with infinite provisions.

The Kingdom message of economic freedom is not the message of a “prosperity gospel.” In fact it is almost the opposite; while giving is part of the kingdom message, the primary reality is about saving and investing. Our investment is more than wise financial investment. It is investment in the greatest agency of the Kingdom, namely people who become disciples. (p.268)

This book is loaded with good material, much of which I have not touched in this summary. I highly recommend that you take the time to read it for yourself.

When Helping Hurts

when helping hurts

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Steve Corbett and Brian Fikkert

When Helping Hurts addresses a Christian response to poverty and community development. The authors confirmed some things that I have known intuitively and introduced me to some great new ideas and strategies. One of the most important concepts in the book is the definition of poverty as the

“result of relationships that do not work, that are not just, that are not for life, that are not harmonious or enjoyable. Poverty is the absence of shalom in all its meanings.” (p.59)

In the materialistic West, we tend to think of poverty as the lack of finances and things; so, we assume that throwing money and resources at the problem will fix it. Experience tells us that this is not the case. Such tactics often entrench people even further in poverty by teaching them to become dependent on the generosity of others instead of working.

If we accept that poverty is the result of broken relationships with God, ourselves, other people, and the creation, then alleviating poverty requires us to commit to the often messy and slow work of restoring those relationships.

A Christian response to poverty initially will focus on restoring the poor to a proper relationship with God through the Gospel. Knowing him as Savior, Lord, Provider, Sustainer, and Keeper – the One who loves us past comprehension – will produce faith that will enable boldness and perseverance in the quest to escape the chains of poverty. Secondly, people need to have their sense of personal worth and dignity restored. Many poor people have accepted the world’s valuation of them as being worthless and incapable. The gospel restores dignity to human beings that inspires confidence and courage to break free. The third leg of the table is the restoration of wholesome life-giving relationships with other people who are willing to mentor, equip, and support them in their journey out of poverty. Lastly, the gospel restores us to a proper relationship with creation by teaching us to be good stewards who appreciate the value of working for God’s glory. With the help of God’s sustaining grace, what was a curse regarding circumstances, family, past mistakes, lack of education, etc. can be turned into a blessing.

While many well-to-do people think of poverty as the absence of things, the poor themselves define it in terms of shame, powerlessness, hopelessness, and having no voice.Much harm has been done unintentionally by well-meaning people who have used a materialistic definition of poverty to come up with a materialistic solution.

The non-poor often have “God complexes” and see themselves as the answer to needs of the poor. This coupled with the feelings of shame and inferiority of the poor who are being “helped” leads to a result that often hurts those who are “helping” and those being “helped.” The authors encourage a much different approach, one that involves a true partnership with and honoring of the poor.

The authors define poverty alleviation as

“the ministry of reconciliation: moving people closer to glorifying God by living in right relationship with God, with self, with others, and with the rest of creation.” (p.74)

Westerners usually do not choose this strategy because it is a relatively slow process for which success is hard to measure. Instead we have most often opted for a “neater and cleaner” way that actually causes harm. For example, a typical way to alleviate hunger is to open a food pantry, stock it with food, set policies, get volunteers, open the doors, ask people to line up to see if they qualify, and give the ones who do a box of food once a month. This method is easy to organize and measure – 5000 served! People can get involved in a nice, safe, and scheduled way – show up on Tuesdays from ten until Noon, and no personal connection with poor people is required. Unfortunately, few seem to realize how shaming this method can be to the ones being “served.” It does not help people to learn to provide for themselves. It is just a handout.

The authors encourage a different model. What if a Christian food ministry were to discover that a neighborhood has a chronic food need? That ministry could then talk to some of the neighbors, listen to their stories, and determine what the poor think about their situation. Those within the neighborhood who could serve as connectors to the larger community could be identified and gathered for further discussions that could lead to the adoption of a plan to come up with a way to provide food for the community by the community. Further discussions might lead to the formation of a community co-op. Those who are interested could buy in for, say, $5 a week. The community leaders would then take that money, perhaps, combine it with money from other sources, and purchase food from a food bank and distribute it to their members. This solution involves community participation and leadership at all levels. Not only is low cost food provided, but a sense of worth and dignity is heightened – all to the glory of God. The authors define such material poverty alleviation as

“working together to reconcile the four foundational relationships so that people can fulfill their callings of glorifying God by working and supporting themselves and their families with the fruit of that work.” (p.74)

One of the reasons that poverty alleviation ministries so often end up hurting the people they serve is because they are one dimensional. Poverty alleviation has three stages: relief, rehabilitation, and development.

“One of the biggest mistakes that North American churches make – by far – is in applying relief in situations in which rehabilitation or development is the appropriate intervention.” (p.101)

Handing out boxes of food is a short term crisis averting solution, but, if it is done over a long period, it will likely foster dependence. Crisis relief should be seldom, immediate, and temporary. Rehabilitation involves working within the framework of the existing community to restore a person, with their participation, to where they were before the crisis. Development, also with their participation, takes them beyond where they were prior to the crisis. The authors spend chapters outlining how this can and should be done. The authors also warn against using the rich using their “power” to circumvent the time consuming work of relationship building and community participation. If we want to see long term results we cannot take short cuts. Partnership, not paternalism, is required.

If you are interested in being part of the solution for helping the chronically impoverished, this book can help you immensely. If you are already involved, it may help you to reevaluate what you are doing in order to be even more effective. It is definitely worth the time to read it.

Radical

radical

Radical: Taking Back Your Faith from the American Dream

by David Platt

Platt, a pastor of mega-church in Birmingham, AL, has written a very refreshing and impacting book that navigates the tension between the attractional church model and the Great Commission. He says he is on a journey in which God is showing he and the church he pastors how to do God’s mission as a church.

His biggest fear “even now, is that I will hear Jesus’ words and walk away, content to settle for less than radical obedience to him.” (p.3)

The book opens with a critique of the American church as a whole. Platt writes:

“I am convinced that we as Christ followers in American churches have embraced values and ideas that are not only unbiblical but that actually contradict the gospel we claim to believe.” (p.3)

“…somewhere along the way we had missed what is radical about our faith and replaced it with what is comfortable. We were settling for a Christianity that revolves around catering to ourselves when the central message of Christianity is actually about abandoning ourselves.” (p.7)

The American church has created for itself:

a nice middle-class Jesus…who doesn’t mind materialism and who would never call us to give away everything we have. A Jesus who would not expect us to forsake our closest relationships so that he receives all our affection. A Jesus who is fine with nominal devotion that does not infringe on our comforts, because, after all, he loves us just the way we are. A Jesus who wants us to be balanced, who wants us to avoid dangerous extremes, and who, for that matter, wants us to avoid danger altogether. A Jesus who brings us comfort and prosperity as we live out our Christian spin on the American dream. (p.13)

Hopefully we can all see how such a mentality is not really a worship of Jesus, but of ourselves. (p.13) This is no small thing. As Platt puts it:

“We may have loved a god that we made up in our minds, but the God of the Bible, we hate.” (p.30)

Platt points out that the root of the problem is found in our American culture

“that exalts self-sufficiency, self-esteem, and self-confidence. (p.32)

Note the contrast, however, when we diagnose the problem biblically. The modern-day gospel says, “God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life. Therefore, follow these steps, and you can be saved.” Meanwhile the biblical gospel says, “You are an enemy of God, dead in your sin, and in your present state of rebellion, you are not even able to see that you need life, much less cause yourself to come to life. Therefore you are radically dependent upon God to do something in your life that you could never do.” (p.32)

We realize we are saved not just to be forgiven of our sins or to be assured of our eternity in heaven, but we are saved to know God. So we yearn for him. We want him so much that we abandon everything else to experience him. This is the only proper response to the revelation of God in the gospel. (p.39)

Instead of trusting in our own abilities and serving a God of our own making, the gospel beckons us to abandon ourselves to God and his mission of reaching the nations with the gospel, depending on his ability and provision.

“God gave his people his image for a reason – so they might multiply his image throughout the world” through the preaching of the gospel. (p.65)

“And to disconnect God’s blessing from God’s global purpose is to spiral downward into an unbiblical, self-saturated Christianity that misses the point of God’s grace.” (p.71)

“…we have…drawn a line of distinction, assigning the obligations of Christianity to a few (e.g. missionaries) while keeping the privileges of Christianity for us all.” (p.73)

Platt invites the reader to

“let your heart be gripped, maybe for the first time, by the biblical prospect that God has designed a radically global purpose for your life…God has created us to accomplish a radically global, supremely God-exalting purpose with our lives…and God has designed our lives for a collision course with the world.” (p.83)

Discipleship

Chapter Five shows the reader that Jesus has a surprisingly simple plan to give us a global impact – discipleship.

One of the unintended consequences of contemporary church strategies that revolve around performances, places, programs, and professionals is that somewhere along the way people get left out of the picture. But according to Jesus, people are God’s method for winning the world to himself. (p.90)

Platt points out that disciple making must take place outside the four walls of the church building, out in the community where people live, work, and play. The church must forsake its obsession with the attractional model and be willing to become the mobile church. Discipleship is more about relationships than events. Platt points out that the Great Commission not only commands us to go, but also to baptize, through which believers become identified with the church, the larger community of believers with whom we live our lives and go on mission. He writes:

“…we will multiply the gospel only when we allow others to get close enough to us to see the life of Christ in action.” (p.99)

“Jesus’ command for us to make disciples envisions a teaching role for all of us.” (p.100)

This raises the bar in our own journey with Christ. In order to teach someone else how to pray, we need to know how to pray. In order to help someone else learn how to study the Bible, we need to be active in studying the Bible. But this is the beauty of making disciples. When we take responsibility for helping others grow in Christ, it automatically takes our own relationship with Christ to a new level. (pp.100-101)

Embracing the call to be a disciple maker requires us to listen to Bible teaching as if we will need to pass it on. It’s one thing to hear a sermon for my on sake, but if I will need to share what I learn later with someone else, I will take notes. It changes everything.

“It is multiplying because the people of God are no longer listening as if his Word is intended to stop with them. They are now living as if God’s Word is intended to spread through them.” (p.103)

Mercy Ministries

Chapter Six, entitled “How Much Is Enough?,” looks at how Christians should relate to the poor.

“According to Jesus, you can tell someone is a follower of Christ by the fruit of his or her life, and the writers of the New Testament show us that the fruit of faith in Christ involves material concern for the poor…If there is no sign of caring for the poor in our lives, then there is reason to at least question whether Christ is in our hearts…if our lives do not reflect radical compassion for the poor, there is reason to wonder if Christ is really in us at all.” (pp.110-111)

Platt shows how the modern obsession with glorious buildings is really an Old Covenant idea. In the New Covenant, God’s temple is formed by“living stones,” people, and the emphasis for us should not be on structures but on people. In this chapter, the author also shows us the reason for worldly wealth, which is to have more to give.

God asks us to give sacrificially “to care for the needy around us.” (p.126)

“But the truth is, there will continue to be millions and millions of people who do not hear as long as we continue to use spare time and spare money to reach them. Those are two radically differing questions. What can we spare? and What will it take?” (p.129)

“What would happen if together we stopped giving our scraps to the poor and started giving surplus? What if we started giving not just what we are able to give but beyond what we are able to give?” (p.130)

“The lesson I learned is that the war against materialism in our hearts is exactly that; a war. It is a constant battle to resist the temptation to have more luxuries, to acquire more stuff, and to live more comfortably.” (p.136)

Platt points out that it is easier to ignore faceless need. Once we come to know those in need, everything changes.

As I see their faces, I realize that I have a choice. You and I both have a choice. We can stand with the starving or with the overfed. We can identify with poor Lazarus on his way to heaven or with the rich man on his way to hell. We can embrace Jesus while we give away our wealth, or we can walk away from Jesus while we hoard our wealth. Only time will tell what you and I choose to do with this blind spot of American Christianity in our day. (p.140)

Responsibility to Preach the Gospel

Chapter Seven deals with the urgency of preaching the gospel to those who have never heard. Platt points out that people will not be sent to hell for not hearing the gospel. Rather those who have never heard will be sent to hell for rejecting the God who created them and reveals himself through creation. Every person comes into this world with a predisposition to be God’s enemy. We cannot excuse inactivity in world missions with the hope that somehow God will give the unreached a pass because they never heard about Jesus. If this were the case, the worst thing we could ever do is preach the gospel to them and thereby bring them under stricter judgment.

“More than five thousand people groups, totaling approximately 1.5 billion people, are currently classified as ‘unreached’ and ‘unengaged.’.. Even worse, no one is currently doing anything to change their situation. No one.” (p.158)

(While, I might not agree with this last conclusion, I am impacted by my responsibility to take the gospel to those who have never heard. – Pete)

Platt goes on:

” The purpose of the church is to mobilize a people to accomplish a mission. Yet we seem to have turned the church as a troop carrier into the church as luxury liner. We seem to have organized ourselves, not to engage in battle for the souls of peoples around the world, but to indulge ourselves in the peaceful comforts of the world…The reward of the American dream is safely, security, and success found in more comfort, better stuff, and greater prosperity. But the reward of Christ trumps all these things and beckons us to live for an eternal [reward]. (pp.170-172)

Radical obedience to Christ is not easy; it is dangerous. It is not smooth sailing aboard a luxury liner; it is sacrificial duty aboard a troop carrier. It’s not comfort, not health, not wealth, and not prosperity in this world. Radical obedience to Christ risks losing all these things. But in the end, such risk finds its reward in Christ. And he is more than enough for us. (p.181)

The last chapter is a challenge to try a radical experiment for one year. Platt asks the reader consider committing to five things over the course of twelve months.

  • Pray for the entire world.
  • Read through the entire Bible.
  • Sacrifice your money for a specific purpose.
  • Spend your time in another context.
  • Commit your life to a multiplying community.

In Luke 10:2, Jesus tells us to pray to the Lord of the harvest that he will send out laborers into the harvest. “When Jesus looked at the harassed and helpless multitudes, apparently his concern was not that the the lost would not come to the Father. Instead his concern was that his followers would not go to the lost.” (p.187) Prayer, therefore, is critical to the mission.

The Word of God cannot be minimized. If God’s people do not spend adequate time reading the Bible, how will we ever fulfill our mission? As for sacrificial giving, Platt points out:

“We are an affluent people living in an impoverished world. If we make only ten thousand dollars a year, we are wealthier than 84 percent of the world, and if we make fifty thousand dollars a year, we are wealthier than 99 percent of the world.” (p.194)

We will answer to God for how we spend our wealth.

The challenge to get outside our comfort zones recognizes that for us to be  incarnational Christians, we must get involved and minister where the people live rather than expect them to come to our church world. We must immerse ourselves in their lives, culture, and needs. Platt also encourages believers to give at least one week per year to world missions. He claims convincingly that what we learn in going will dramatically impact our effectiveness closer to home. He includes all believers in this challenge when he writes:

Consider what happens when all of us begin to look at our professions and areas of expertise not merely as means to an income or to career paths in our own context but as platforms for proclaiming the gospel in contexts around the world. Consider what happens when the church is not only sending traditional missionaries around the world but also businessmen and businesswomen, teachers and students, doctors and politicians, engineers and technicians who are living out the gospel in contexts where a traditional missionary could never go. (p.203)

Lastly, Platt makes a case for committing to a local body of believers that is pursuing the mission of God, where radical commitment to Christ is taught and modeled.

“…look for the best avenue within that community of faith to be about making disciples.” (p.206)

The Complete Book of Discipleship

book of discipleship

 

by Bill Hull

First of all, Bill has been on his discipleship journey for about forty years. He has been writing about this topic for a long time, too. This is one of those books from which you will be quoting. Not only is there a wealth of information, but Bill challenges his reader to the core.

Bill deals with the “elephant in the room” – consumerist non-discipleship Christianity. He shows how capitulation to our culture has robbed the church of her obedience, power, and vibrancy. He also addresses the false notion that discipleship can be thought of as a program for new believers that can be checked off the list and moved beyond. Discipleship is a lifetime journey.

Bill gives his readers a brief overview of the history of discipleship in the church, beginning with the Greco-Roman world up through Dietrich Bonhoeffer. At the end of the book he catches us up on present thoughts and practices. He also covers the marks of a disciple, the stages of discipleship, what is involved in spiritual transformation, the various approaches to disciple making, the role of small groups in the process, how discipleship works in the church, leaving a generational legacy through discipleship, and, finally, the future of discipleship. At the end of the book, referring to some of Barna’s research, he gives five examples of churches which seem to be doing a good job at making disciples, each one doing it a different way.

Some of the “gems” that I have taken from my reading of this book are below. I suppose everyone will be impacted slightly differently, depending on where each of us are in our own journey; but, I believe any serious disciple will benefit from giving this work a chance.

The Discipleship Cycle

(The graphic below is my design.)
discipleship processBill shares that most churches do a pretty good job at focusing on growth in knowledge of the Bible, learning ministry skills, and focusing on inner character transformation. Where we break down is usually in the area of being personally accountable to a mentor and in making a commitment to invest in at least one other person at any given time. I would add that unless sharing the Gospel with those who do not yet know Christ is added to the cycle, we will miss a fundamental aspect of disciple making.

Bill talks about entering into training rather than simply trying harder. He emphasizes the importance of cultivating the inner life, something that is a little foreign to many evangelicals formed by our consumer culture. Bill also is big on having a manageable way to measure progress, which evidences his leaning toward the engineer mindset. (See my summary of Peter Block’s book, The Answer to How Is Yes.) This does not mean we become regimented or program-oriented, but it does require giving some thought to providing a way to facilitate growth.

One of the best sections addresses the need for leaders to “detox” by giving up the “gods” that traditionally have ruled over our concept of church “success” and which militate against true discipleship. The first of these is the worship of attendance. Quoting Dallas Willard, Hull writes:

We must flatly say that one of the greatest contemporary barriers to meaningful spiritual formation into Christlikeness is overconfidence in the spiritual efficacy of “regular church services.”… One way to give up the god of attendance is to replace it with a different goal. When our goal moves from wanting recognition from others to the transformation of others, we put the god of attendance in its place. (p.265)

Secondly, leaders must stop bowing down to the god of “increase.” I will quote one line:

“Perhaps the toughest place to decrease is in the influence and power we hold over people around us. Any leadership based on increasing the leader is wrong.” (p.267)

The third “god” that must be dethroned in our lives is “competence.”

The culture honors competence. But the myth of competence is thinking that we’ll outgrow our weaknesses, sins, fears, and disappointments. The myth is that we’ll reach a place of spiritual competence where we’ll “get it together.” Those times never come. In fact, as we become more like Jesus, our dependence on God increases… Our wounds and weaknesses are real; our inabilities are exposed for others to see. When we lead with our weakness and our wounds, we gain a powerful way to touch others around us. (p.268-9)

Hull exhorts leaders to focus on the development of the inner life and giving ourselves over to the principle of discipleship.

“The principle of God’s plan of discipleship is the impact of one life on another – the character, skill, and perspective of one godly person influencing another willing person.” (p.270)

A final benefit is that this book provides a wealth of lists of reading materials for the person who wants to go deeper into learning about this most interesting and important topic. You should read this book!

The Faith of Leap

faith of leap

The Faith of Leap: Embracing a Theology of Risk, Adventure, and Courage

by Michael Frost and Alan Hirsch

By the authors’ own admission, this was a book that began with a focus on mission and communitas and morphed into being a treatise on faith, adventure, and risk taking. The subtitle is “Embracing a theology of risk, adventure, and courage.” Frost and Hirsch show how the church is called to embrace a culture of liminality in order to complete its mission of bringing God’s kingdom to our communities.

Liminality is the term we use to describe a threshold experience. It is composed of any or a combination of danger, marginality, disorientation, or ordeal and tends to create a space that is neither here nor there, a transitional stage between what was and what is to come. As a result it is experienced as a place of discomfort and agitation that requires us to endure and push into what is to come. (p.19)

Part of the nature of liminality is that it is an adventure with an uncertain outcome that tests us, bonds us, and pulls out of us the genius of innovation and creativity. Necessity is the mother of invention. Most churches begin rather liminally, perhaps as a house church or some other type of plant. At the beginning those involved understand and participate in the adventure, but, unfortunately, most churches move as quickly as possible out of the liminal stage into safety, security, and equilibrium. This often changes the very nature of the church and causes the people lose focus, energy, and purpose – a slow kind of death.

The authors contend that God’s mission of redemption in the world is the proper catalyst to bring life and meaning back into the lives of Christians. In other words, rather than being worship-driven attractional churches, we are called to be mission-driven servant churches. This does not mean we cease to worship. Far from it! But we do not stop with worship. We allow our worship of God to propel us forward into the mission of God.

We are the people born of the missio Dei. This means that the church is a result of the missionary activity of God and not the producer of it. The church is therefore defined by its mission and not the other way around.  And this mission of redemption is not yet fulfilled; therefore, we are still on the Journey. As in our previous books, we say that Christology (our primary theology) determines Missiology (our purpose and function), which in turn determines Ecclesiology (the forms and expressions of the church.)…The church doesn’t have an agenda; it is the agenda. The church doesn’t have a missional strategy; it is the missional strategy. (p.21)

Quoting Hedrik Kraemer, the authors write:

…the church is always in a state of crisis and…its greatest shortcoming is that it is only occasionally aware of it…The church “has always needed apparent failure and suffering in order to become fully alive to its real nature and mission…And for many centuries the church has suffered so little and has been led to believe that it was a success…Let us also know that to encounter crisis is to encounter the possibility of truly being the church. (p.23)

Another quote is ascribed to Catholic theologian Hans Kung:

A church which pitches its tents without constantly looking out for new horizons, which does not continually strike camp, is being untrue to its calling…[We must] play down our longing for certainty, accept what is risky, live by improvisation and experiment. (p.24)

Being in liminal situations forces us to deal with the unfamiliar, which can light the fires of the entrepreneurial spirit.

Innovation usually arises out of a sense of need, even desperation, as organizations strive to keep the edge. Living systems theory maintains, rightly, that the sweet spot of innovation takes place on “the edge of chaos,” or on what is called a “burning platform” – a situation where the organization is threatened with possible dissolution…This in turn can trigger the entrepreneurial spirit, because such displacement puts a person and an organization in an environment that creates the possibility of “opportunity recognition.” One of the rules of innovation is Think like a beginner, not an expert. (p.48)

Movements happen when the church manages to shake off its collective fears and plunges into the mission of God in the world, where, while experiencing liminality and disorientation, they also get to encounter God and each other in a new way. (p.53)

Communitas in [Victor Turner’s] view happens in situations where individuals are driven to find each other through a common experience of ordeal, humbling, transition, and marginalization. It involves intense feelings of social togetherness and belonging brought about by having to rely on each other in order to survive. (p.56)

Mission, then, becomes the driving or catalytic force behind community, one of the four main functions of the church.

Since Constantine, the church has mostly been driven by a worship mentality, as it gathers once or more a week for music, singing, and teaching. Community and discipleship usually happen as the church gathers for worship. In this model, mission is something extra the church does when it is not meeting together, and is usually relegated to an elite group called “missionaries.” But when mission becomes the catalytic force in our churches, everything else is heightened and comes in line with God’s purpose for the church – to seek first the Kingdom of God and be his ambassadors of reconciliation.

Most churches are mainly audiences and any member of an audience is dispensable. As soon as you know you’re dispensable, the impetus for attendance is lost….Liminal churches are more like repertory theater companies…For a liminal church, there needs to be a similarly common ordeal, and everyone needs to be committed to the challenge collectively. Without significant levels of buy-in or stake holding by the team, the possibility of significant levels of innovation and energy are reduced. (pp.99-100)

In this model, mission catalyzes discipleship.

We have a friend who says she believes churches should get Bible teaching “on a need-to-know basis.” In other words, a church should open their Bibles together and learn from Scripture according to the contextual challenges and ordeals they are currently facing together. Sadly, many Christians don’t “need to know” what they hear each Sunday, and so they retain very little of it. (p.119)

I don’t fully agree with the above thought. As a Bible teacher, I understand the need for people to have a solid foundation of Biblical truth so that they are prepared for what life throws at them. However, I do agree that more of our teaching and preaching should be designed to equip people for actual ministry. In fact, I believe teaching should happen in the midst of actual ministry, in an apprenticeship format. Jesus taught truth and modeled ministry. Then he sent his disciples out to teach and do ministry.

Real discipleship must include involvement in ministry or it is only instruction, not discipleship.We are called to teach people to do everything Jesus commanded, not just know about it. And remember unused truth is lost truth…If our congregations are not engaged missionally in the ongoing work of serving the poor, feeding the hungry, challenging society, preaching the gospel, and responding to unbelief, they will have little need for our teaching. (p.120)

Regarding the function of leadership in the liminal church, the authors refer to a book entitled, Surfing on the Edge of Chaos:

It is so counter-intuitive today for a leader to push his or her church toward chaos [liminal uncertainty] when everything within them tells them to move back to the center, to stability… Real leaders ask hard questions and knock people out of their comfort zones and then manage the resulting distress…The role of leadership here is to continually unsettle the community, holding its feet to the fire of mission and marshalling the God-given potential that emerges in times of dissonance and uncertainly. Part of the key to effectively “surfing the edge of chaos” involves helping community members to overcome the toxic levels of risk aversion currently present in our churches. (p.131-2)

Frost and Hirsch point out that Jesus brilliantly addressed the problem of risk aversion in his disciples with these familiar words:

“For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.” Matthew 16:25 (ESV)

Jesus knows that if we can be freed from our aversion to loss, our whole outlook on risk would change…We are averse to loss much more than we are attracted to gain. But this was an aversion that Paul had abandoned by the time he wrote to the Philippians. For him all was gain, because he had lost his life for Jesus’ sake…part of the key to understanding why many Christians seem so loss-averse…[is because] for many of them their relationship to Jesus is located in the pledge of life, not the life they pledged. (p.136-8)

In other words, many Christians come to God as consumers rather than as servants. God is seen as a divine servant catering to our needs and desires, instead of our Master and Lord for whom we lay down our lives. God help us!

Leadership looks to unleash the missional capacities in the people of God. Living systems theory generally teaches us that leaders should disturb, but not direct, their organizations. This means that leaders have to remember that in living systems, things happen that you cannot predict, and, once they do, those events can set off avalanches with consequences that you could never imagine. You can disturb a church by embracing the risk of taking it into liminal space and remaining there until the God-given potentials of the people are accessed…Missional leadership isn’t about social engineering or barking orders to compliant underlings. If there is any manipulation involved, it is about manipulating the environment to unleash the congregation’s latent missional potential – its apostolic risk-takers, its prophets, and its pastors…It’s important to realize that leadership can’t dictate outcome…The trick is to create a design that allows a community to face issues squarely, to learn from itself, to come up with its own solutions to its problems…Taking the risk of leading a community of believers into mission and then daring to believe that in such a chaotic environment new solutions will emerge from within the community itself is often a step too far for many church leaders. But we are convinced that embracing such a risk is essential.(p.148-151)

Of course, all the above must be done with a complete reliance upon God.

The next to last chapter addresses the missional church’s call to neighborliness.

A missional church sees itself as a sent community, and where incarnational mission is the organizing function, social context becomes an extremely important matter. In effect, a missional church identifies itself to some considerable measure as God’s gift to a town or village or neighborhood…A key issue for any group willing to embrace the risk and adventure of mission is to dare to believe that they have been sent to stay home. That is, that home might be the very best place for them to serve, and the missionary call to “go” might still apply, but it is a going deeper, not a going away. (p.184)

The authors suggest that we should see our locality as being “genuinely important to our missional calling.” It is as we have discovered at Life Community Network, we are called to pastor the neighborhoods in which we live, as well as go to the nations. Perhaps churches need to consider relocating to the neighborhoods they serve, or even to abandon buildings altogether in order to force their congregations to think “outside the four walls.” This is not for everyone,  but it could be for some. It has been for us.

Short-term mission trips are fine as far as that goes, but they are often manageable, bite-sized experiences to compensate us for the fact that we should see our own homes as mission fields, our own neighborhoods as liminal spaces, our own culture as the sphere of adventure to which we’ve all been called. (p.201)

Referring to Jesus’ parable of the mustard tree, the authors write:

…the mustard tree is a sprawling, bushy shrub that sends out this massive unruly root system. It can be harder to uproot a mustard tree than a far taller cedar. Stuart [Murray Wilkins of Urban Expression in the U.K.] said when we look for signs of the kingdom, we often look for the big things, but maybe Jesus saw the kingdom as spreading and persistent. Stuart’s advice was not to try to plant massive churches but to cultivate churches with deep roots, – like a spreading weed that will not go away. A lot of traditional church-planting strategies are aimed at cultivating cedar-like trees. But if we take our neighborhood more seriously and engage more seriously in relational proximity and cultural exegesis, we could end up planting mustard bushes, deeply rooted and vastly spreading. (pp.201-2)

The book is loaded with examples of groups and individuals who have launched various expressions of missional kingdom work around the world. I feel sure that you will be inspired by this book and highly recommend it.

Share this post...