Heliocentrism is regarded as an established scientific fact by most of the church in the West. It will probably come as a great shock for many to discover that, first of all, it is not scientifically proven, and, secondly, it is an occult religion.

Heliocentrism Has Not Been Scientifically Proven

Leading astrophysicists over the last five hundred years agree that it is impossible to prove the heliocentric theory through observation from the earth. Models can be constructed that will explain all astronomic phenomena using either the geocentric or heliocentric position.

People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations, For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.    —Cosmologist George Ellis, in Scientific American, “Thinking Globally, Acting Universally”, October 1995

J.D. Bernal stated:

[Copernicus’] reasons for his revolutionary change were essentially philosophic and aesthetic,” and in a later edition he is more convinced that the “reasons were mystical rather than scientific”   —J. D. Bernal, Science in History, 1st edition, London, Watts, 1954; 2nd edition, 1965).

Conversely, empirical experiments, such as Airy’s Failure and the Michelson-Morley experiment,  prove that the earth is at rest.

The data [of Michelson-Morley] were almost unbelievable… There was only one other possible conclusion to draw – that the earth was at rest. – Physicist Bernard Jaffe, Michelson and the Speed of Light, 1960, p.76.

The only alleged proof we have that seems to prove heliocentrism are the images of a spherical earth suspended in space provided by NASA. That agency has lied to us so often that it is unreasonable to accept as true anything it offers.

Einstein, who accepted that the earth’s revolution around the sun was a given, developed his theory of special relativity to explain away the unexpected results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. His conclusion was that it is impossible for us to tell whether the earth is moving or the sun, moon, and stars. How convenient! Satan always has a clever counter argument that defies all sound reasoning but baffles those who accept that the “experts” are so much smarter than we are that we cannot hope to ever comprehend their wonderful insights. That is how brainwashing works.

Heliocentrism Is an Occult Religion

Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: ‘Ye must have faith.’ —Max Planck

[Copernicus’] work, published in 1543, was called On the Revolution of the Celestial Spheres. It stated that the center of the universe was a spot somewhere near the sun…The scheme met the requirements of philosophical and theological belief in circular motion. In every other respect, however, Copernicus struck at the heart of Aristotelian and Christian belief. He removed the Earth from the center of the universe and so from the focus of God’s purpose. In the new scheme man was no longer the creature for whose use and elucidation the cosmos had been created. His system also placed the Earth in the heavens, and in doing so removed the barrier separating the incorruptible from the corruptible.  —James Burke, The Day the Universe Changed, p. 135

Both Copernicus and Isaac Newton were devotees of Egyptian “hermetics,” an occult pursuit of alchemy that supposedly originated with Hermes (hence, “hermetics”) Trismegistus from ancient Egypt, according to Masonic author, Albert Mackey. Here are Copernicus’ own words. Judge for yourself.

In the middle of all sits Sun enthroned. In this most beautiful temple could we place this luminary in any better position from which he can illuminate the whole at once? He is rightly called the Lamp, the Mind, the Ruler of the Universe: Hermes Trismegistus names him the Visible God, Sophocles’ Electra calls him the All-seeing. So the Sun sits as upon a royal throne ruling his children the planets which circle round him. The Earth has the Moon at her service. As Aristotle says, in his On Animals, the Moon has the closest relationship with the Earth. Meanwhile the Earth conceives by the Sun, and becomes pregnant with an annual rebirth.  —Nicolaus Copernicus , De Revolutionibus, Of the Order of the Heavenly Bodies

Copernicus uses unmistakable religious language that elevates the sun, Helios or Sol, to god status.

The Copernican conclusion is that the sun rules the earth, via “gravity,” and the other “wandering stars,” which are all named after pagan gods and goddesses. Put another way, the sun controls the earth, keeping her in submission to Helios or Sol, which are names associated with Satan himself. NASA images of the sun make it out to be a raging, threatening nuclear inferno that threatens to engulf and annihilate everyone on earth, another clear reference to Satan and hell. The actual sun is nothing like that.

  NASA computer generated image

  Photograph

Sir Isaac Newton, whose theories, especially regarding the theory of universal gravitation, seemed to imbue heliocentrism with scientific credibility, was a secret alchemist, who wrote more than a million words about alchemy, sorcery associated with transforming lead into gold. Michael White in his book, Isaac Newton, the Last Sorcerer, quoted John Maynard Keans, who said that Newton was the “last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians.” (pp.2-3) His theory of universal gravitation, according to Dickson White in his book, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology, was “destined to be fatal to the old theory of creation.” (Vol. I, 15) That in itself should make anyone who believes the Bible is the standard of all truth question the validity of universal gravitation. Things fall down at a certain rate of acceleration until they encounter a medium of greater density, or they rise until they encounter a medium of less density. In no way does this prove that all masses pull on one another. It also assumes the existence of a vast region called “outer space,” which is nowhere taught in the Bible. According to God’s Word, all heavenly lights are contained in the vault of the firmament. None of these lights are said to be solid spherical objects that are part of an evolutionary ever expanding universe.

Newton claimed to have discovered mathematical and physical proof for the principles found in occult hermetic writings.

Newton was also a fan of Hermes Trismegistus and translated one of his books, The Emerald Tablet, into English. One of the quotes from this book obviously influenced Newton’s work regarding gravity. He said, “The sun’s force is above all force, for it vanquishes every subtle thing and penetrates every solid thing.”

Johannes Kepler, another highly regarded astronomer from that period, wrote in his book titled, Of the Harmony of the World:

Newton effectively legitimized pagan sun worship by giving it an apparent scientific basis, much as Charles Darwin provided a scientific rationale for those wishing to abandon the acknowledgement of a Creator with regard to the origin of life.

A false explanation of creation presents a false testimony of the Creator.

• Link to page containing all articles in the series.
• Link to previous article in the series.
• Link to next article in the series.
• Link to Resource Page.