Legalism and control are twins that depend on each other. God gave us freedom when he created us, but we traded our liberty for bondage when we fell for the devil’s false narrative in the garden. By pursuing what was presented as freedom from having to depend on God, we were trapped in bondage to sin and death. Jesus came to set us free once again, which we can experience if we are willing to voluntarily surrender ourselves to his benevolent lordship. Freedom is found in God. it is an unearned gift that came at great cost to our Lord. It’s opposite is the bondage of sin.
Freedom is based in truth. Bondage is founded on a lie.
The gift of grace provides freedom; whereas, legalism, which is founded on the lie that we can and must earn our right standing with God, always produces darkness and slavery to sin. Truth produces freedom. Lies produce slavery.
Jesus said to the people who believed in him, “You are truly my disciples if you remain faithful to my teachings. 32 And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” John 8:31-32 (NLT)
At the government level, the bondage of sin produces the darkness of totalitarianism.
Totalitarian governments prey upon the fears of the populace by offering security in return for the surrender of personal freedoms.
The goal of such governments is total power, wealth, and control. Sometimes more sinister ends are pursued, such as Nazi Germany’s plan to exterminate the Jews or China’s plan to snuff out the church. Once freedoms have been forfeited, the true nature of the totalitarian government emerges, resulting in the suppression of truth and anything that sets people free on the inside, such as faith in God and free speech. Propaganda replaces the sharing of freedom producing truth and ideas. Thought and speech are monitored to make sure everyone is toeing the line and marching in lock step. Where freedom exists, people are able to worship, speak, and assemble as they see fit. They are also allowed to have the means to defend themselves.
Totalitarianism also exists at the church level. The principle is the same as in government.
The church preys upon the ignorance and fear of the people and offers them a clear path to security with God at the price of surrendering to church control.
Keep the rules and kiss the ring, and you can go to heaven.
The Roman Catholic Church maintained such control over most of Europe during the Middle Ages. As with governments, the goal was power and wealth. To achieve this the church developed elaborate schemes to hold the populace in check. The church was presented as the only gateway that common people had to reach God. They were taught that the church held the key to obtaining and maintaining a right standing with God. Only the priests could provide the sacraments that kept open the door to God – baptism, confirmation, holy communion, confession, matrimony, holy orders, and the last rites. Common people, called the laity, were taught that they had no direct access to God, making them dependent on the the mediation of the priesthood. All of this is contrary to the New Covenant.
For there is only one God and one Mediator who can reconcile God and humanity—the man Christ Jesus. 1 Timothy 2:5 (NLT)
The Reformation set dynamite to this Roman church’s totalitarian structure, opening the gates to the masses to approach God directly without needing the mediation of the church or the priesthood. The Word of God became the standard for judging what is right and wrong and acceptable to God, replacing the Catholic Church’s insistence that church tradition and the infallibility of the papacy trumped the Bible.
In the brave new world of the Protestant movement, people’s freedom to worship according to the dictates of personal conscience was restored, at least partly, which introduced a greater degree of personal accountability. Reformers took advantage of this freedom to explore and develop their own versions of what it meant to follow God, resulting in an explosion of new sects and denominations. But the Reformation did not deal with the inherent desire in humanity to control others. Soon the Protestants were seeking such control over the new sects, even to the point of persecution. Some things never change.
Today, in America, where at the moment we still have freedom to worship as we see fit, we usually find legalistic control at the denominational and local church levels.
We are free to associate with whatever church we choose, but sometimes we may find ourselves being manipulated and controlled within the church of our choice. Here are some of the things to which we should be alert in our quest to ferret out and free ourselves from legalism.
Insistence of the Acceptance of Non-essential Doctrines and Positions
An essential doctrine is one that is required for us to be called a Christian. If God does not require it for entrance into heaven, it is not essential here on earth either.
Any church or leader that requires members to adhere to doctrines that fall into the non-essential category should be questioned as to why? If we are satisfied with the answer, we may wish to stay. If not, we probably should leave.
Church leaders sometimes use their influence to pursue personal “pet” projects. For example, the United Methodist Church has aligned itself with the LGBT and transgender positions, forcing its members to choose between adhering to traditional biblical morality and leave the church or stay with the denomination as it careens away from biblical truth. Those members who have no firm anchor in God’s Word will likely be swept away by the church’s improper use of its influence and power. If you are in a church that is more loyal to a popular societal position than to God’s truth, get out before you partake it its judgment.
The Exaltation of Leaders
Totalitarian regimes, even in the church, always have a privileged ruling class. Jesus taught that a qualifier for leadership in his kingdom is being a servant.
But Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers in this world lord it over their people, and officials flaunt their authority over those under them. 26 But among you it will be different. Whoever wants to be a leader among you must be your servant, 27 and whoever wants to be first among you must become your slave. 28 For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve others and to give his life as a ransom for many.” Matthew 20:25-28 (NLT)
If you see that your church improperly exalts its leaders, it should serve as a red flag. It is always appropriate to honor our leaders (1 Thessalonians 5:12, 1 Timothy 5:17), but never to put them in a separate status above the rest of the church.
The Attempt to Control Personal Decisions
Our forefathers in America during the Great Awakening defined slavery in a broad sense as not being allowed to follow the dictates of our own conscience. They were willing to fight and die to secure this freedom, but today we meekly acquiesce when the government routinely strips us of making personal decisions, such as during the coronavirus lock down. During what was called the Discipleship Movement a few decades ago, church members were told not to make everyday family decisions, such as buying new appliances or a car, without checking in first with whomever was in their discipleship up line.
It is never a good thing to make decisions for other adults because it strips away dignity and hinders personal and spiritual growth.
Paul made it clear that we are never to seek such dominance over the faith of others.
But that does not mean we want to dominate you by telling you how to put your faith into practice. We want to work together with you so you will be full of joy, for it is by your own faith that you stand firm. 2 Corinthians 1:24 (NLT)
If you are in such a church, get out before you get used to being a slave.
The Attempt to Control Thought and Speech
Our society is currently being assaulted by the thought and speech police who run Big Tech and who censor and seek to manipulate political outcomes in violation of our First Amendment rights. We are being told what words we can use, what positions we can have, and with what political party we should align.
The church sometimes has been duped into adopting a false sense of guilt and responsibility built on a false narrative.
For example, we are told that refusing to embrace the LGBT position is tantamount to a hate crime. However, if the Bible is true, we must love those who embrace that sinful lifestyle and proclaim that this way of doing life is in direct opposition to the purposes and plan of the Creator and will ultimately end in death and destruction. The gospel does not condemn us in our sin, but offers a way out. We condemn ourselves if we refuse the offer. God’s judgment against sin stands. The only remedy is faith in Jesus. The church is to operate in the dynamic tension between loving people who have been deceived and captured by sin while holding to the biblical position that all sin will be judged. Jesus did this, and the Holy Spirit can help us to share the truth with love, too.
If we find ourselves in a church that tries to control thought and speech, we must flee and find somewhere that allows people to pursue God in accordance with their own conscience and understanding of God’s Word.
Healthy churches teach biblical truth and encourage their people to check it out for themselves.
And the people of Berea were more open-minded than those in Thessalonica, and they listened eagerly to Paul’s message. They searched the Scriptures day after day to see if Paul and Silas were teaching the truth. Acts 17:11 (NLT)
Conclusion
In writing this article, I have made the presupposition that the reader understands that freedom does not preclude the proper function of godly authority in the church. The road we travel has two ditches to avoid: antinomianism and legalism. We live in a dynamic tension between freedom and control. True freedom is allowing God’s Spirit to control us. He uses people to help us along the way, especially church leaders, who are responsible before God for their flock. They are charged with teaching God’s truth, encouraging the weak and faint hearted, rebuking the headstrong when they plunge into sin and error, and even on occasion administering church discipline.
We must live in a dynamic tension between properly listening to those whom God placed in authority in our lives, while maintaining personal responsibility before God for our thoughts and actions.
Likewise, church leaders must always evaluate how far their authority can be properly exercised without damaging their people’s relationship with God. As with government, less is better.
